Package Base Details: rust-git

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Keywords: mozilla rust
Submitter: mrshpot
Maintainer: spider-mario (ishitatsuyuki)
Last Packager: ishitatsuyuki
Votes: 27
Popularity: 0.49
First Submitted: 2012-01-21 11:30
Last Updated: 2018-02-11 11:49

Pinned Comments

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2019-10-21 06:32

I'm not actively maintaining this package at this moment. If you want to contribute a PKGBUILD or other change, let me know.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... Next › Last »

SolarAquarion commented on 2017-07-18 03:26

Can you please remove the epoch? @ishitatsuyuki

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2017-05-20 05:24

@spider-mario, would you mind transferring this package to me? Currently the PKGBUILD of mine and you diverges quite much, and I'd like to bring my own improvements to more AUR users.

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2017-04-22 14:49

LLVM 4.0 is now in main repository, I have confirmed that Rust works with that.

Sorry for advertising here, but I have also added clippy packages to [rust-git].

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2017-04-19 11:45

LLVM 4.0 is in [testing]. DO NOT UPGRADE.

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2017-04-17 07:40

Checkout my unsigned repository for packages built with my own, diverged PKGBUILD:

This is updated on a best effort basis. Normally I rebuild every week, but sometimes I could be busy. Feel free to mail me to request an update.

You're welcome to use this for reference:

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2017-03-31 02:53

I have upgraded my PKGBUILD. No more build twice problems, and it now splits things by dist packages.

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2017-03-20 01:31

It's stored in a folder with the name of host triple, which can't be easily determined by the script. Moving them out is very tricky, and that's why I'm trying to avoid it.

spider-mario commented on 2017-03-19 16:46

How easy would you say it is to split it? If it’s significantly easier to build just one package, 4MB doesn’t seem a very big price to pay.

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2017-03-13 04:06

Please cast an opinion on adding analysis as a separate package or not.

I have already managed to build one with the analysis data (available with the latest package on my server). They're about 4M in package size. Should I split them? It's necessary for RLS, but their characteristics are like debug symbols.

spider-mario commented on 2017-03-12 13:32

@intelfx, I am not sure that I understand all your issues. Let me try to clarify a few things:

- pkgver() (the function) does increase monotonically. I do not change the variable because I want to let users choose when to rebuild (especially as it is an expensive process), and for the most part, changes to the PKGBUILD are merely so that it keeps building—if you weren’t going to rebuild the package to start with, you won’t necessarily want to update just because I fixed building against, say, revision 5e9149d7. (Unless you were actively waiting for the fix, probably.)

- submodules in the source array are just for caching between runs of makepkg. If a submodule is absent from the array, it will be fetched normally by the configure script. It is a bit suboptimal bandwidth-wise but it should not break the build. It seems that the build was indeed broken recently, but for another reason: Apparently, it can be fixed either by running `make dist` after `make` (as in Gentoo’s ebuild) or by passing `--disable-dist-src` to configure (as in ishitatsuyuki’s PKGBUILD—I have backported this fix, thanks).

Do you still get an error with the fix (or with ishitatsuyuki’s PKGBUILD)?