Package Base Details: linux-lqx

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex muqss proton zen
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 141
Popularity: 1.76
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08
Last Updated: 2021-11-25 19:20

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available:

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps:// --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D; done

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... Next › Last »

brunomiguel commented on 2021-09-23 02:45

I made no changes, I'm using the original PKGBUILD

vp1981 commented on 2021-09-23 02:04

Hello brunomiguel.

I have just built linux-lqx with GCC. Are you using exactly the same PKGBUILD and config as the AUR package or did you add/change something yourself?

brunomiguel commented on 2021-09-23 01:30

I'm building the latest version but I get the following error

ZSTD22  arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.zst
  CC      arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.o
FATAL: modpost: drivers/net/wwan/rpmsg_wwan_ctrl: sizeof(struct rpmsg_device_id)=32 is not a modulo of the size of section __mod_rpmsg__<identifier>_device_table=120.
Fix definition of struct rpmsg_device_id in mod_devicetable.h
make[1]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:150: modules-only.symvers] Erro 1
make: *** [Makefile:1770: modules] Erro 2

damentz commented on 2021-09-20 00:35

@vp1981, that is correct, Liquorix now uses PDS. It's spiritually very similar to MuQSS.

From my early testing, single threaded performance is much higher than MuQSS, but multithreaded performance suffers a bit. However, the delta is not big enough to be an issue for Liquorix's target behavior and the single threaded performance is arguably more important for common activities most people do on their systems.

vp1981 commented on 2021-09-19 23:48

So, there is no more MUQSS, right?

vp1981 commented on 2021-08-22 12:40

Hello. Something strange is going on with key servers. I couldn't find key 9AE4078033F8024D on but found it on, didn't try to import it using that server though.

damentz commented on 2021-06-22 01:15

Wow, that's unfortunate. I just updated the instructions to use instead.

arnamak commented on 2021-06-22 00:03

It would appear that, as of today, the keyserver listed in the pinned comment no longer works.

According to the status page for, this is due to further GDPR takedown requests.

Is there an alternate keyserver we can use?

damentz commented on 2021-06-07 14:55

Yes, that is strange. This issue would come back occasionally when updates were pulled from upstream Arch, but that was due to pulling a function that would try to dynamically determine the kernel version.

This time around nothing like that is happening, but whatever is determining the version isn't pulling from $pkgver like it should.

@sirlucjan, do you have any ideas? Maybe upstream Arch has already deviated and we need to pull its updates.

ryshglene commented on 2021-06-07 06:07

Upgraded to 5.12.9.lqx2-1, and yet the kernel name remains 5.12.9-lqx1-1-lqx?