Package Base Details: font-symbola

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: grawlinson
Maintainer: grawlinson (caleb)
Last Packager: caleb
Votes: 72
Popularity: 4.05
First Submitted: 2020-03-21 23:45
Last Updated: 2020-03-27 16:02

Pinned Comments

caleb commented on 2020-03-25 05:53

In the latest release of this package I've introduced a workaround to force fresh downloads whenever we bump the package release number, not just the version. This should work around most people's caching issues resulting from upstream's replacing files without changing the filename or versions.

If you hit a checksum error now please flag this package as out of date.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

caleb commented on 2020-07-27 12:09

@Soptik That checksum you posted in your out of date flag is already the checksum used by this package, it hasn't changed. What has changed is the base name for the package, I suspect you are using the outdated Git repository name. I suggest a fresh clone.

caleb commented on 2020-05-01 11:13

@balticer I have unflagged this as it is not out of date yet. You have the same issue noted in a few previous comments here. The output you posted with your flag shows that you have the wrong git repository checked out. Note the package base name has changed and you seem to be cloning the old repository. Please update and build from this package.

sjugge commented on 2020-04-17 05:59

@caleb, thanks. You're right, the package / repo listed here is fine.

I was working with the ttf-symbola repo which I've had on my system for some time, and shows this AUR page as well. I did not realize I probably missed an update about this. Switched to the font-symbola, no issue anymore.

caleb commented on 2020-04-16 21:53

@sjugge This package is not out of date. I just checked it. According to the log message in your OOD flag message you are building this from an old clone of the repository. It is currently at PKGVER=7, you are trying to build PKGVER=1. You need to update your git clone of this repo to build.

caleb commented on 2020-04-02 17:46

@crs I unflagged this package because ⓐ I just checked the download again and it hasn't changed and ⓑ the checksum you provided in your flag message suggesting "the current download computes as" IS the current checksum in the PKGBUILD and .SRCINFO file. You appear to be testing with an old version of the package: I suggest you update your git checkout. If you still have problems let us know.

caleb commented on 2020-03-31 21:17

@aiM0a I just re-downloaded the file and the checksum has not changed.

caleb commented on 2020-03-30 21:07

@whooper It's currently up for me. It could have been a temporary issue, or you could be IP blocked or something like that. In any case there isn't much this package recipe can do about it, that is the ONLY legal site to download it from because the license expressly prohibits redistribution.

whooper commented on 2020-03-30 16:47

I'm getting a time out trying to download The website seems to be down?

caleb commented on 2020-03-27 16:04

@nTia89 ① Oops, it was there but must have gotten lost in the merge. Fixed. ② I'd love it if the entire infinality ecosystem went away enough we could delete it, but there are folks still using it, even if I'm not one of them. I'm already working on removing the excess/duplicate packages. Someday we'll be able to drop the configs entirely because usage will be near zero. I don't think we're there yet. In the mean time you don't have to use them ;-)

nTia89 commented on 2020-03-27 14:17

@caleb ① ttf-symbola-infinality doesn't have ttf-symbola as its dependency and more "serious" reading its description this package contains a font, that's not true; I think it is an avoidable misunderstanding; on the other hand, you can list ttf-symbola-infinality as optional dependency for the ttf-symbola package. ② I AM NOT AN EXPERT but -infinality/-ib group/packages have been abandoned since most of the infinality capabilities have been activated/merged upstream; you can achieve an almost visually equal result with upstream packages, thus we do not need no more those. (correct me if I am wrong) ③ ok