Package Base Details: amdapp-sdk

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Submitter: Vi0L0
Maintainer: rigred
Last Packager: satcom886
Votes: 83
Popularity: 0.000055
First Submitted: 2013-02-11 21:03
Last Updated: 2019-08-16 21:33

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... Next › Last »

BluePeril commented on 2011-09-24 20:25

AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5-RC2-lnx32.tgz is missing in the tarball

danmilon commented on 2011-09-23 00:42

@kralyk Gotcha. Thank you for your help!

kralyk commented on 2011-09-22 23:02

@razorg: I wouldn't know about that, I personally don't use yaourt, sorry.
The package works allright using standard process, and that's the furthest I can be concerned.

Those zero-sized *-RC2-* files are a trick that ensures proper extraction of the sources, which AMD packs in a strange way.

As all the deps are in repos, I suggest you build this pkg in a stadard way using makepkg (makepkg -sic for convenience).

danmilon commented on 2011-09-22 21:35

@kralyk actually i am installing through yaourt. Should the problem exist there also?
Thank you.

kralyk commented on 2011-09-22 17:15

@razorg: You need to download the whole tarball, not just the PKGBUILD.

danmilon commented on 2011-09-22 00:27

gives error on building:
==> ERROR: AMD-APP-SDK-v2.5-RC2-lnx32.tgz was not found in the build directory and is not a URL.
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build amdstream.

kralyk commented on 2011-09-19 16:14

Thanks, updated (hope it's ok).

toffyrn commented on 2011-09-19 13:24

The sha256sum seems to have changed. :)

yiuin commented on 2011-08-23 19:50

Problem was with iptables .... I was blocking, and I guess that prevented clinfo from connecting to X. I'll delete these comments in a day or so since they aren't really relevant.

yiuin commented on 2011-08-23 19:19

@kralyk: It just hangs. So does clinfo, which also gives the warning:

./clinfo: /usr/lib/ no version information available (required by ./clinfo)

I am currently using libcl, so maybe I will try libopencl although I installed that earlier and I believe it was the same thing without the warning about version information. I'll post on the forum.