Package Details: xiphos-git 1:4.1.0.r69.g8845c65b-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/xiphos-git.git (read-only)
Package Base: xiphos-git
Description: A Bible study tool -- git version
Upstream URL: http://xiphos.org
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: gnomesword, xiphos
Provides: gnomesword, xiphos
Submitter: haawda
Maintainer: haawda (caleb)
Last Packager: caleb
Votes: 1
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2016-03-03 18:46
Last Updated: 2019-08-26 05:34

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

MisterEwok commented on 2013-09-01 11:42

So, I just reinstalled this on a fresh arch installation without the symlink and it worked perfectly.

MisterEwok commented on 2013-09-01 11:26

Sorry, I don't know what namcap is, and no, I did not modify the PKGBUILD

Alister.Hood commented on 2013-08-05 01:32

Oh, I see.
The issue could be to do with this:

svn: E155036: Please see the 'svn upgrade' command
svn: E155036: The working copy at '/var/cache/yaourt-src/xiphos'
is too old (format 29) to work with client version '1.8.1 (r1503906)' (expects format 31). You need to upgrade the working copy first.

After running `svn upgrade` in the working copy for both xiphos-svn and sword-svn, and rebuilding sword, I don't need the link.

Alister.Hood commented on 2013-08-05 00:44

Only libglade ;)
But I modified the PKGBUILD to build a gtk2 version. I presume you didn't do that, MisterEwok?

haawda commented on 2013-08-03 15:22

You guys that need the ln-command to compile this: does namcap tell you something about missing deps?

MisterEwok commented on 2013-08-02 15:18

Thank you Alister.Hood. That worked!

Alister.Hood commented on 2013-08-01 05:16

Try `ln -s /usr/include/sword/remotetrans.h /usr/include/sword/ftptrans.h`

MisterEwok commented on 2013-07-31 20:21

I get the same error as shackra. Is there a way to download the winsock.h header somwhere?

haawda commented on 2013-07-02 16:03

gtkhtml4 is definitely checked in the build process.

Alister.Hood commented on 2013-07-01 13:28

From the svn log it seems you shouldn't need gtkhtml when building against gtk3 (I didn't check, I built against gtk2 and both gtkhtml and webkitgtk2 were required :( )