Package Details: xf86-video-intel-git 1:2.99.917+899+gf66d3954-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: xf86-video-intel-git
Description: Intel i810/i830/i915/945G/G965+ video drivers
Upstream URL:
Keywords: git intel xf86 xorg xserver
Licenses: custom
Groups: xorg-drivers
Conflicts: xf86-video-i810, xf86-video-intel, xf86-video-intel-legacy, xf86-video-intel-sna, xf86-video-intel-uxa, xorg-server<1.20
Provides: xf86-video-intel, xf86-video-intel-sna, xf86-video-intel-uxa
Replaces: xf86-video-intel-sna, xf86-video-intel-uxa
Submitter: None
Maintainer: yurikoles (JstKddng)
Last Packager: yurikoles
Votes: 121
Popularity: 0.196503
First Submitted: 2008-07-27 16:36
Last Updated: 2020-02-02 22:04

Dependencies (20)

Required by (6)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

yurikoles commented on 2018-05-19 00:12

PRs are welcome:

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... Next › Last »

anrxc commented on 2014-04-21 20:32

I've fallen behind on upgrades. If you notice another ABI
change before me again let me know. Thanks.

illuminatedgeek commented on 2014-01-14 00:21

The ABI version reached 15 recently, and this change is effective in the driver. The PKGBUILD should be changed to have X-ABI-VIDEODRV_VERSION=15 as a dependency instead of 14.

I tested this change on my system and it compiles and runs properly with the new X server.


nicklej commented on 2013-12-25 23:50

OK, this was probably my fault. (Ignore my last comment, deleted) It would seem that I have all of the base-devel packages, but not base-devel itself. I used some danged installer last install. And I now recall attempting to install base-devel and seeing that all the packages were already installed. But it would seem they were all installed independently of base-devel. I have no idea why. I may have actually been missing libtool at the time. I'm not really sure how to investigate further. But yeah, it would seem that Marcel was right on the money. I'm now itching to reinstall manually... maybe when I find the time. Cheers.

nicklej commented on 2013-12-25 22:23

Hmmm, I had already installed base-devel. I was under the impression that makedepend installs the lib and then removes it after building, and I thought thats what it had done with libtool. But I just checked and I have libtool 2.4.2 installed. I didn't realize libtool was part of base-devel until just now. Seems a little fishy if you ask me. Thanks for your attention.

anrxc commented on 2013-12-15 20:33

Hello, OK that makes sense. And what makes more sense is what
Marcel_K tried to tell us. It is expected of everyone wanting
to use AUR to manually install 'base-devel' first; gettext,
libtool etc.

Consulted with community members and received confirmation via:

nicklej commented on 2013-12-15 04:33

Sorry to just now get back to this. I currently have gettext
I attempted to build the package again, and got this:

autoreconf: Entering directory `.'
autoreconf: not using Gettext
autoreconf: running: aclocal ${ACLOCAL_FLAGS} -I m4
autoreconf: tracing
autoreconf: not using Libtool
autoreconf: running: /usr/bin/autoconf error: possibly undefined macro: AC_DISABLE_STATIC
If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow.
See the Autoconf documentation. error: possibly undefined macro: AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().

I noticed the bit about "not using gettext". I wasn't sure if adding something to makedepends just installed it or actually told makepkg to use it, so I added gettext to makedepends and got the same thing. Then I added libtools as well, and now it works. Thank god, I can now use firefox again! I hope this helps in some way.

anrxc commented on 2013-10-16 15:53

Thanks for the info Marcel. But let's just see first what nicklej says about
gettext on his system.

From there debug further what _really_ is the missing makedepend if not that.

anrxc commented on 2013-10-16 15:53

Thanks for the info Marcel. But let's just see first what nicklej says about
gettext on his system.

Marcel_K commented on 2013-10-16 14:20

gettext shouldn't be in makedepends, as it's part of base-devel. Every system that build packages should have all in base-devel installed.

anrxc commented on 2013-10-16 14:04

Hi I don't think it's your problem. This may be an obscure makedepend on gettext
package. Check if you still have that one on the system and if you don't we'll
make it a makedepend.