Package Details: util-linux-aes 2.34-8

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/util-linux-aes.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: util-linux-aes
Description: Miscellaneous system utilities for Linux, with loop-AES support
Upstream URL: https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: eject, util-linux
Provides: rfkill, util-linux
Replaces: rfkill
Submitter: None
Maintainer: TrialnError
Last Packager: TrialnError
Votes: 5
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2011-03-02 21:16
Last Updated: 2020-01-12 20:03

Required by (251)

Sources (13)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

mystique commented on 2018-12-01 13:01

404 for 0001-sfdisk-support-empty-label-use-case.patch

Was trying to build runit and runit-systemd, this is a dependency.

Found this:

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/manjaro/packages-openrc/master/util-linux-nosystemd/0001-sfdisk-support-empty-label-use-case.patch

makepkg -si builds with the above file manually placed.

xerc commented on 2014-04-28 23:09

now provides package https://www.archlinux.org/packages/core/i686/libutil-linux/

xerc commented on 2013-06-05 21:49

updated version with the new filesystem structure

Anonymous comment on 2013-02-22 19:56

with last update it breaks my boot...does it have hany specific dependency with other packages than the ones indicated? thanks for your continuous effort in updating this package!

xerc commented on 2013-02-18 14:25

new release including config-file for /etc/modules-load.d

xerc commented on 2012-11-21 23:56

"This package does *not* modify your kernel in any way"
http://loop-aes.sourceforge.net/loop-AES.README .. gn8

sysfu commented on 2012-11-21 23:47

Does this package automatically patch the kernel or update the loop.ko module like the util-linux-ng-aes package did?

sysfu commented on 2012-11-21 23:44

OK, much to my surprise, that worked, thank you.

xerc commented on 2012-11-21 23:34

before posting - the package was upgraded to 2.22.1 - dependencie fixed your problem ;)

sysfu commented on 2012-11-21 23:31

OK, much to my surprise, that worked, thank you.