Package Details: ubports-installer-git 0.8.8_beta.r3.g9319bc3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ubports-installer-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ubports-installer-git
Description: A simple tool to install Ubuntu Touch on UBports devices
Upstream URL: https://github.com/ubports/ubports-installer
Keywords: installer phone touch ubports ubports-installer ubuntu
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: ubports-installer
Provides: ubports-installer
Submitter: matthias.lisin
Maintainer: matthias.lisin
Last Packager: matthias.lisin
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.000140
First Submitted: 2019-02-28 00:39
Last Updated: 2021-05-25 22:23

Latest Comments

matthias.lisin commented on 2020-11-04 00:06

@desaparecido Sorry, been a while since I last used it. Don't have the time to test it on a real device. Please give me feedback is something is still broken.

desaparecido commented on 2020-11-03 10:31

hi, I have this error when patch apply, some ideas to deal with successfully ?

==> Starting prepare()...
patching file src/utils.js
Hunk #1 FAILED at 223.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/utils.js.rej
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().

thanks

matthias.lisin commented on 2020-03-03 10:59

@gmelchett Thanks for the heads up. Haven't used this package myself in a while.

Removed the check since it appears to change very often. Might add a sustainable solution later on.

Also updated to use electron6.

gmelchett commented on 2020-03-03 09:08

The disable-update-check patch still doesn't apply. Remove?

matthias.lisin commented on 2019-11-03 16:37

@TimorLee Thanks for letting me know. It was not merged as you suspected. The code inside the patches changed, therefore it failed.

TimorLee commented on 2019-11-03 15:44

Apparently disable-update-check.patch has been merged so can be removed from the PKGBUILD. Otherwise I get an error when applying the use-system-tools.patch "Hunk #1 failed at 222".

matthias.lisin commented on 2019-03-08 15:38

I have successfully installed Ubuntu Touch on my Nexus (4) using this package just now.

So this pretty much confirms that it works properly without root permissions.