Package Details: transmission-remote-gui-bin 5.18.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/transmission-remote-gui-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: transmission-remote-gui-bin
Description: Cross platform remote GUI for the Transmission daemon
Upstream URL: https://github.com/leonsoft-kras/transmisson-remote-gui
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: transmission-remote-gui, transmission-remote-gui-git, transmission-remote-gui-gtk2, transmission-remote-gui-qt4
Provides: transmission-remote-gui
Submitter: sebba
Maintainer: ogarcia
Last Packager: ogarcia
Votes: 16
Popularity: 0.000262
First Submitted: 2015-12-27 13:22
Last Updated: 2019-10-13 10:42

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

ogarcia commented on 2020-08-09 11:44

@jpegxguy yes, I have it annotated to do when next release

jpegxguy commented on 2020-08-04 10:27

The GitHub url gets redirected to https://github.com/transmission-remote-gui/transgui. Maybe you should replace it in the sources array

ogarcia commented on 2020-08-04 10:25

@jpegxguy yes, but I don't decide ¯\(ツ)/¯ xDDD

For me al packages must use this (removing the name of itself in conflicts):

provides=('transmission-remote-gui')
conflicts=('transmission-remote-gui-bin' 'transmission-remote-gui-gtk2'
           'transmission-remote-gui-qt4' 'transmission-remote-gui-gtk2-git'
           'transmission-remote-gui-qt4-git')

But this is a community decision.

jpegxguy commented on 2020-08-04 10:17

Sure, I think package names follow the program name most of the time. As I said in my second comment though I think it's clearer what the function of the program is as you have it right now. And it is mentioned in the git anyway.

So your opinion is that it is the transgui packages that should go.

ogarcia commented on 2020-08-04 10:13

@jpegxguy I repeat, the package name is transmission-remote-gui, the binary can be called as developer wants, this not alter the package name. Is the bind package called named because the binary is named? Your argument is invalid.

jpegxguy commented on 2020-08-04 09:46

the package name is transmission-remote-gui

The GitHub page suggests that the name of the executable is now trangui. (Also that way in the filesystem. I do think it's clearer with this name though...

The old link gets redirected to https://github.com/transmission-remote-gui/transgui.

This configuration seems older, with the leonsoft-kras repo, that gets redirected

ogarcia commented on 2020-08-04 08:09

@jpegxguy I don't see the problem, the transgui packages are bad created because the package name is transmission-remote-gui, and there is three packages of transmission-remote-gui:

- transmission-remote-gui: Build from source, QT (in my opinion this package must be named transmission-remote-gui-qt)
- transmission-remote-gui-gtk2: Build from source, GTK2
- transmission-remote-gui-bin: Binary package

And could be two more packages:

- transmission-remote-gui-qt-git: Build form source, QT, git version
- transmission-remote-gui-gtk2-git: Build form source, GTK2, git version

jpegxguy commented on 2020-08-03 15:08

There are way too many packages for this. There's the transgui range of packages and the transmission-remote-gui range of packages. (By range I mean the version for qt, gtk2, and any git versions)

I think only one range should remain. It is called transgui in the GitHub page, isn't it?

see https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/?K=transgui+OR+transmission-remote-gui

MasterOne commented on 2019-10-26 09:56

@ogarcia, thanks, transmission-remote-gui-gtk2 works.

ogarcia commented on 2019-10-25 07:54

@MasterOne There is an issue on upstream https://github.com/transmission-remote-gui/transgui/issues/1241

Seems that the binary is compiled with an old version of gtk2 library. You can use this package instead https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/transmission-remote-gui-gtk2/