Package Details: thinkingrock 2.2.1-7

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: thinkingrock
Description: Java-based GTD application
Upstream URL:
Licenses: CDDL
Submitter: mathieu.clabaut
Maintainer: rfnash
Last Packager: rfnash
Votes: 43
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2007-09-27 13:39
Last Updated: 2015-08-18 17:56

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

evorster commented on 2016-07-05 12:12

When I opened this application for the first time, it says that there is a version 3.4.2 available.
Unfortunately, the website it's on is currently on Google's dangerous sites list because it's serving malware.

Any chances of this package getting an update?

heinrich5991 commented on 2015-08-17 16:55

Doesn't build for me, it says:

$ packer -S thinkingrock
Dependency `jre6-compat' of `thinkingrock' does not exist.

capoeira commented on 2014-09-27 16:51

working nice now. still the only GTD I found with a good workflow

rfnash commented on 2014-07-25 17:39

I think I've fixed the problem described by capoeira, thanks to the discussion thread he linked. Basically, ThinkingRock needs java6, and jdkhome has to point to an installation of java6. I've added a dependency to a package that provides java6, and changed jdkhome to point to it.

xyproto commented on 2014-02-20 12:05

Since this application is no longer being developed as an open source application (for a few years now), and now seems to be causing problems for some users, I'm disowning it. If it's not adopted for a while, I'll request for it to be deleted on the mailing list.

capoeira commented on 2014-01-27 10:49

if anybody could help, i opened a topic:

capoeira commented on 2014-01-27 09:30

well, that sucks
it's not working with openjdk either

xyproto commented on 2014-01-25 12:33

That might be. Have you tried with openjdk?

capoeira commented on 2014-01-25 12:09

look at that. migt be because i'm using JRE?

xyproto commented on 2014-01-24 14:40

Made a few minor updates to the PKGBUILD.

capoeira, thinkingrock build, installs and runs just fine here. If there are problems with the application itself, report it upstream to the thinkingrock developers. (It seems like they have stopped developing the open source edition of thinkingrock, though, so I would not have too high hopes for seeing any improvements ever).