Package Details: subversion-1.6 1.6.23-4

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: subversion-1.6
Description: A Modern Concurrent Version Control System
Upstream URL:
Licenses: Apache
Conflicts: subversion, svn
Provides: subversion, svn
Submitter: sLite
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: sLite
Votes: 15
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2011-12-21 14:38
Last Updated: 2015-11-07 00:49

Dependencies (20)

Required by (493)

Sources (5)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

sLite commented on 2012-02-15 14:43

you could edit the PKGBUILD manually and remove all of the java/python stuff you don't need.

apart from that, java is only a build dependency, so as soon as it is installed you should be safe to remove java again.

Anonymous comment on 2012-02-15 14:32

Any idea how I can install Subversion 1.6 without JRE/JDK?

test0 commented on 2012-02-02 14:04

Mmh, quite marvellous... not to say delightful... mmh. *readjusts monocle*

sLite commented on 2012-02-02 11:06

there you go

a1russell commented on 2012-02-02 01:14

Haha, oops! ;-)

sLite commented on 2012-02-02 00:39

whoops, sorry for that one, fixing it tomorrow, i'm not using the package myself anymore, thats why i didn't notice.

a1russel, this is obviously your fault, hand back that cherry immediately ;)

nevermind, thanks both for your contribution ^^

test0 commented on 2012-02-02 00:11

Hi, could you please change the entries "provides" and "conflicts" from ('svn subversion') to ('svn' 'subversion')? Otherwise you cannot update to the new package version if you have packages installed that depend on "subversion".

However, thanks for maintaining this package.

sysrob commented on 2012-02-01 15:26

remember to export JAVA_HOME if you want to build as well the JavaHL or you will get a non-suitable JDK has been found (and a recomendation to patch your build script with --with-jdk= that doesn't fix the problem)

sLite commented on 2012-02-01 11:57

Hihi, nice. Thanks for your work. You get your cherry back for this ;)

a1russell commented on 2012-02-01 04:31

Thanks; it does work for me, indeed.