Package Details: sonarr 2.0.0.5338-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sonarr.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sonarr
Description: PVR for newsgroup users
Upstream URL: https://sonarr.tv
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: justin8
Maintainer: degeberg
Last Packager: degeberg
Votes: 80
Popularity: 0.108742
First Submitted: 2014-11-10 04:45
Last Updated: 2019-08-17 05:50

Dependencies (9)

Required by (5)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next › Last »

skynet77 commented on 2014-07-03 20:19

new version is 1635

updated PKGBUILD here: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=B0AnaFvV

bladesuk1 commented on 2014-06-16 18:43

new version is 1594

new md5sum value is 64e0f6ed7df08bf63c583f39476641b6

bladesuk1 commented on 2014-06-13 11:37

new version is 1586

change the first md5sum to this:

f9bda8f89dbb5ef3c8f27dbb2c90ef8e

that should sort out the packagebuild

bladesuk1 commented on 2014-06-13 11:29

there's a tar file available here:

http://update.nzbdrone.com/v2/master/mono/NzbDrone.master.tar.gz

that might be a better way to pull it down, rather than unpacking the .deb file? should hopefully fix the issues with the missing deb file as well (which i'm also having, btw).

daveerickson commented on 2014-05-10 02:44

It doesn't appear that the 1350 deb is still available. I get a 404 error when I try to install.

degeberg commented on 2014-04-28 07:11

I believe it works now. I guess it was a problem with the server on their end.

Korni22 commented on 2014-04-27 16:53

Download is broken, because the verification of the .deb fails.

The verification fails, because the .deb returns just the homepage of the project.

pho commented on 2014-01-25 12:54

Ok good point.
I always saw sabnzbd, sickbeard and couchpotato as their own and found it easier to manage that all the packages are in /opt/{pkg}.
But I see your point now.

degeberg commented on 2014-01-24 04:53

I mean to refer to the sickbeard package, by the way.

degeberg commented on 2014-01-23 20:36

As I previously said, I think that categorically stating "[in] /opt as it should be" is highly debatable.

The Arch Packaging Standard says that "/opt/{pkg}" is for self-contained packages, and "/usr/lib/{pkg}" is for libraries. I think what I've placed under /usr/lib counts as libraries used for the mono program (run via the /usr/bin/nzbdrone executable script).

Multiple other packages do something similar. I mentioned chromium earlier, but to mention a few more: r, virtualbox, erlang, ghc. I'm sure I could find more if I bothered. These are packaged by Arch Linux TUs/devs, so I think they can reasonably be regarded as an authoritative interpretation of the packaging standards. Even the mono package, which nzbdrone uses, stores its *.exe files under /usr/lib/mono and has tiny shell scripts in /usr/bin looking like "exec /usr/bin/mono /usr/lib/mono/whatever" like I do.

If you want an example from AUR, I can point to the sabnzbd package (which as a "competitor" program must be a reasonably close example for comparison purposes) that is packaged in exactly the same way as this package.

If you feel this should be changed, please do provide a compelling counterargument, and I'll of course consider it. So far I've heard nothing but "I think otherwise".