Package Details: ruby-neovim 0.9.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ruby-neovim
Description: Ruby bindings for Neovim
Upstream URL:
Keywords: neovim ruby
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: fwalch
Maintainer: tjquillan
Last Packager: tjquillan
Votes: 18
Popularity: 0.003055
First Submitted: 2016-07-10 19:28
Last Updated: 2021-09-24 17:13

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

fwalch commented on 2018-02-05 20:37

Okay, I found out why this didn't happen on my system: It took my ~/.gemrc into account, which contains --no-document. Curiously, it seems like some other ruby-* packages (including ruby-msgpack) don't take this into account either, and don't build when I remove my ~/.gemrc, too.

Anyway, I added --no-document to the PKGBUILD, which is what e.g. ruby-hypricot does. Thanks for the hints!

Libbum commented on 2018-02-05 08:02

Not 100% sure, but I needed to install ruby-rdoc too. This step doesn't pass if not: Installing ri documentation for neovim-0.7.0

fwalch commented on 2018-02-04 12:07

jrudess: Why is this needed? I am able to build/use this package without having ruby-rdoc installed.

jrudess commented on 2018-02-03 15:41

The package is missing a build dependency: ruby-rdoc

fwalch commented on 2018-02-02 22:21

lucc: Thanks for the heads up, updated.

lucc commented on 2018-02-02 14:46

ruby-msgpack has been updated

fwalch commented on 2018-01-14 11:48

I cannot update this package to its current version 0.7.0 because that needs ruby-msgpack >= 1.1.0. AUR only has ruby-msgpack 1.0.0. I contacted the ruby-msgpack maintainer, hopefully it will be updated soon.

fwalch commented on 2017-10-13 18:30

m3thodic: Sure, thanks for the hint! Updated the PKGBUILD.

m3thodic commented on 2017-10-13 18:14

Hi, thanks for the package. Could you please change the PKGBUILD to call the system ruby instead of relying on $PATH:
local _gemdir="$(/usr/bin/ruby -e'puts Gem.default_dir')"

This solves my issue with installing this package along side my rvm installation.


fwalch commented on 2017-10-09 20:36

Fuelen: It builds fine for me with both plain makepkg and with pacaur, so I don't know.. is your ruby package (contains the gem executable) up to date?