Package Details: rocketchat-server 3.14.5-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rocketchat-server
Description: The Ultimate Open Source WebChat Platform
Upstream URL:
Keywords: chat
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: serialoverflow
Maintainer: funilrys
Last Packager: funilrys
Votes: 6
Popularity: 0.004360
First Submitted: 2016-08-13 23:43
Last Updated: 2021-06-07 21:53

Pinned Comments

funilrys commented on 2021-02-27 19:37

Hello, World! :-)

This AUR package is now managed on GitHub. Feel free to submit your package/installation issues as long as PR in the GitHub repository.

From now on, every change made inside the GitHub repository will be automatically synchronized here.

As of now, every day around 21:00 (UTC); this package would be updated automatically - if a new version is available.

Stay safe and healthy.


Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

Bodenhaltung commented on 2019-02-24 19:27

Same Problem here:

==> Validating source files with sha512sums... rocketchat-0.74.2 ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

dimti commented on 2018-08-31 07:03

Please up version in PKGBUILD to 0.69.0 Becouse package not integrity check. By url i fetch 0.69.0 rocketchat version. Or my aur on my system is dummy?

tecHunt commented on 2018-04-05 03:02

with 0.63.0 I got the error:

Exception in callback of async function: Error: The module [...] was compiled against a different Node.js version using NODE_MODULE_VERSION 57. This version of Node.js requires NODE_MODULE_VERSION 59. Please try re-compiling or re-installing

to fix this I had to execute:

cd /usr/share/rocketchat-server/programs/server/npm/node_modules
sudo -u rocketchat npm rebuild

omgold commented on 2017-10-23 11:42

Source archive seems to be gone. But latest can be found here:

Lazy commented on 2017-07-29 23:39

I haven't been able to get this thing to successfully go.
It needs a rocketchat user, and then it wants to use nvm to get modules that should already be there in the package but the directory is different than what it is looking for.
I want to try it out, and even the ubuntu snap is too much trouble.

0x0049 commented on 2016-10-30 06:29

I have a package I created here:

If that looks good enough I could maintain it here instead?

serialoverflow commented on 2016-09-30 12:11

This package is hacky, insecure and not very stable. I really don't recommend using it and yes, i wrote it.
I won't update this package because I am using the official docker container.

chron commented on 2016-09-30 12:05

Why are you building/installing nodejs/dependencies after the installation of the package? Thats what build() is for.