Package Details: pythonmagick 0.9.19-3

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pythonmagick
Description: Object-oriented Python bindings for the ImageMagick library
Upstream URL:
Licenses: custom
Submitter: flori
Maintainer: mschu
Last Packager: mschu
Votes: 27
Popularity: 0.000006
First Submitted: 2007-08-11 17:00
Last Updated: 2020-05-01 16:51

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

LeonidasXIV commented on 2012-04-22 08:31

Doesn't work:

Python 3.2.3 (default, Apr 14 2012, 17:08:04)
[GCC 4.7.0 20120407 (prerelease)] on linux2
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import PythonMagick
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.2/site-packages/PythonMagick/", line 1, in <module>
from . import _PythonMagick
ImportError: /usr/lib/ undefined symbol: PyClass_Type

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-31 07:59

Checksums invalid again. New one is:


Anonymous comment on 2011-12-27 03:02

Checksums seem to be invalid. This one works:


adament commented on 2011-08-28 20:22

The import problem can be fixed by changing the first line in PythonMagick/ to be: import PythonMagick._PythonMagick as _PythonMagick

adament commented on 2011-08-28 17:58

The standard build couldn't import _PythonMagick because of undefined references, this was because it didn't link to boost_python3 even though it was specified to do so, I fixed it in the following PKGBUILD.

However I still can't get it to import PythonMagick unless I'm in the directory with _PythonMagick

I get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "/usr/lib/python3.2/site-packages/PythonMagick/", line 1, in <module>
import _PythonMagick
ImportError: No module named _PythonMagick

mschu commented on 2011-06-22 18:19


Note that it might be enough to just add python3/site-packages to your python2 path (untested). I chose to make a complete separate package because it links to python2 libraries.

gringotumadre commented on 2011-06-22 13:59

Hi mschu! A python2 version would rock ;) Thanks for the PKGBUILD.

Anonymous comment on 2011-04-26 12:02

Please add a python2 version. This would be very nice because all the web frameworks are still Python 2.x.

mschu commented on 2011-03-26 15:50

updated to 0.9.5 using Python 3.2; if there's more than one person that needs python2 support I will add a package as well

bug commented on 2011-03-14 23:03

0.9.5 is out...