Package Details: python-magic-ahupp 0.4.24-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: python-magic-ahupp
Description: A python wrapper for libmagic
Upstream URL:
Licenses: MIT
Provides: python-magic
Submitter: wzyboy
Maintainer: wzyboy
Last Packager: wzyboy
Votes: 15
Popularity: 0.78
First Submitted: 2016-07-05 02:35
Last Updated: 2021-12-14 21:02

Required by (57)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

wzyboy commented on 2021-05-09 20:26

@yochananmarqos Indeed. Thank you. I have updated the PKGBUILD.

yochananmarqos commented on 2021-05-09 19:29

This no longer conflicts with python-magic, see the issue @L0ric0 linked below.

wzyboy commented on 2021-05-09 11:40

Sorry I updated the package and tested locally but forgot to commit and push...

L0ric0 commented on 2021-03-09 20:38

could you remove the provides line until is fixed? as the implement different apis

txtsd commented on 2021-01-19 05:57

The license directory is incorrect. It should be /usr/share/licenses/, not /usr/share/license/

wzyboy commented on 2021-01-16 23:07

@yochananmarqos Fixed. Thank you.

yochananmarqos commented on 2021-01-16 15:29

python is a missing dependency. The license should be installed with the package.

wzyboy commented on 2021-01-02 04:34

@yochananmarqos Oh now I remember why I added conflicts and provides at the beginning... I've reverted the commit. Sorry for the trouble.

yochananmarqos commented on 2021-01-02 04:28

@wzyboy: While that may be true, there are conflicting files. Please revert the change. This is what happens when attempting to install python-magic:

python-magic: /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/__pycache__/magic.cpython-39.opt-1.pyc exists in filesystem (owned by python-magic-ahupp)
python-magic: /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/__pycache__/magic.cpython-39.pyc exists in filesystem (owned by python-magic-ahupp)
python-magic: /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/ exists in filesystem (owned by python-magic-ahupp)

wzyboy commented on 2021-01-02 03:47

@txtsd You are right. These two packages share the same name but does not provide the same interface. I've removed the conflicts and provides line. Thank you for pointing out.