Package Details: pandoc-bin 2.11.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pandoc-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pandoc-bin
Description: Pandoc - executable only, without 750MB Haskell depends/makedepends
Upstream URL: http://pandoc.org
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: pandoc
Provides: pandoc
Replaces: pandoc-lite, pandoc-static
Submitter: cdkitching
Maintainer: cdkitching (xgdgsc, Techmeology)
Last Packager: xgdgsc
Votes: 139
Popularity: 7.63
First Submitted: 2017-10-03 08:45
Last Updated: 2020-10-16 13:06

Dependencies (1)

Required by (165)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6

runical commented on 2017-06-26 13:56

@cdkitching: Pandoc-static was indeed available, but it was made obsolete by the introduction of a statically linked pandoc in the repos. Hence, Fauno deleted the package. However, you should be able to get the package name by cloning pandoc-static.

However, shouldn't the name be pandoc-bin, as you're just taking the executable provided by upstream? Static implies that you build the package locally, but statically linked.

cdkitching commented on 2017-06-25 20:43

Looks like you're right, joelongjimian. Let's do that.

joelongjiamian commented on 2017-06-25 20:39

That's not quite true; the total size once installed is still nontrivial. Here's the output from pacman -S pandoc-citeproc for me:

resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (59) ghc-8.0.2-1 haskell-aeson-1.1.2.0-6 haskell-aeson-pretty-0.8.5-2

(etc)

Total Download Size: 52.25 MiB
Total Installed Size: 544.46 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 493.11 MiB

As far as I can tell most of this comes from ghc.

In any case, it appears that pandoc-citeproc is also provided by the debian package, so I guess it might be easier to add a package_pandoc-citeproc() to your PKGBUILD.

cdkitching commented on 2017-06-25 20:07

The -static name was already taken by a defunct package. That was the first thing I tried...

cdkitching commented on 2017-06-25 20:06

Pandoc-citeproc in community pulls in a much smaller set of Haskell packages, so doing this for that package saves you only around 50MB, rather than the 700 you get from this

Alad commented on 2017-06-25 14:27

Could you please give it some meaningful name instead of the nonsensical "lite"... i.e. pandoc-static, pandoc-bin, pandoc-hackage, etc.

joelongjiamian commented on 2017-06-25 12:39

any plans for pandoc-citeproc too? same thing happened to that