Package Details: openswan 2.6.51.5-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/openswan.git (read-only)
Package Base: openswan
Description: Open Source implementation of IPsec for Linux
Upstream URL: https://www.openswan.org
Licenses: GPL, custom
Conflicts: ipsec-tools, strongswan
Submitter: Allan
Maintainer: severach
Last Packager: severach
Votes: 143
Popularity: 0.126295
First Submitted: 2009-11-07 14:39
Last Updated: 2019-08-10 00:57

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

Anonymous comment on 2013-06-13 23:23

1) Should depend on python2
2) /usr/lib/openswan/verify should have a she bang point to python2: #!/usr/bin/python2

Thanks :)

Anonymous comment on 2013-06-11 23:38

I would say using "conflict"[1]

[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#conflicts

Thanks!

fcolista commented on 2013-06-08 15:31

Ok, what's the best way to do it?

Anonymous comment on 2013-06-08 15:27

Flagging it out of date - could you make it clearer to use Openswan instead. Also I am updatig the wiki that is still mentioning this package.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/L2TP/IPsec_VPN_client_setup

xjpvictor commented on 2013-06-04 12:42

Updated to use /usr/bin

fukawi2 commented on 2013-06-04 01:10

Please update PKGBUILD to install binaries to /usr/bin instead of /usr/sbin in line with recent changes: https://www.archlinux.org/news/binaries-move-to-usrbin-requiring-update-intervention/

fcolista commented on 2013-05-24 18:03

Bah, now actually there's no difference.
Looking at https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/openswan/ seemst that it hasn't been updated since over a year, i took the package since it was orphan.
Now seems to be alive.
There's no need, then, to use this package.

fauno commented on 2013-05-24 16:56

what's the difference with the "openswan" package?

xjpvictor commented on 2013-04-03 14:17

Dropped and adopted openswan instead.

fcolista commented on 2013-01-18 13:04

Please try this last package.
Thanks