Package Details: openblas-lapack 0.3.6-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: openblas-lapack
Description: Optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2 1.13 BSD (providing blas, lapack, and cblas)
Upstream URL:
Licenses: BSD
Conflicts: blas, cblas, lapack, lapacke, openblas
Provides: blas=3.8.0, cblas=3.8.0, lapack=3.8.0, lapacke=3.8.0, openblas
Submitter: sftrytry
Maintainer: eolianoe
Last Packager: eolianoe
Votes: 82
Popularity: 0.086411
First Submitted: 2013-11-20 23:53
Last Updated: 2019-05-06 19:16

Required by (370)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

huyizheng commented on 2019-08-31 07:31

There's a bug of this package. It provides blas/cblas/lapack, but it doesn't provides "/usr/lib/pkgconfig/{blas.pc, cblas.pc, lapack.pc}", which makes some packages that requires these files failed to build against this package. The package openblas at community repo provides blas, and it does provides "/usr/lib/pkgconfig/blas.pc".

a.kudelin commented on 2019-05-06 20:49

@eolianoe If you was experiencing a problem with threaded OpenBLAS, please, open an issue on its github page. AFAIK, OpenBLAS is alright with OpenMP, moreover, openblas in the community repo comes with the option USE_OPENMP=1.

eolianoe commented on 2019-05-06 19:16

@thrasibule: USE_COMPILER_TLS was needed to avoid a bug, I removed it @a.kudelin: BUILD_LAPACK_DEPRECATED is needed to build some old codes and OpenMP was bugguy a while back when using in a OpenMP, some tests are needed to check if everything is ok

a.kudelin commented on 2019-05-06 08:05

NO_LAPACK=0 is enough for LAPACK to be enabled, and BUILD_LAPACK_DEPRECATED=1 is excessive. Mb, it's worth to enable OpenMP?

thrasibule commented on 2019-05-06 02:04

USE_COMPILER_TLS is not used anywhere in the code (I know it's disabled in the PKGBUILD, but if one tries to set it to 1, one might be surprised that it doesn't do anything.) You probably meant to use USE_TLS=0 instead.

petronny commented on 2019-05-05 18:28

Hi, this is not an any package. Please update its arch to ('x86_64').

eolianoe commented on 2019-04-29 15:11

@syamajala: this package provides BLAS and LAPACK but I think that only blas is optimised

syamajala commented on 2019-03-28 21:54

The this is packaged makes so much more sense to me than the community package. Is there a reason why the community one can't be replaced by this?

eolianoe commented on 2019-03-10 15:01

@alleut: it provides lapack @petronny: the PKGBUILD is now more in synced with the community one

alleut commented on 2019-03-08 13:41

What's the current difference between this and the community package?