Search Criteria
Package Details: open-stage-control 1.8.1-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/open-stage-control.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | open-stage-control |
Description: | A libre desktop OSC bi-directional control surface application |
Upstream URL: | http://osc.ammd.net/ |
Licenses: | |
Submitter: | daniel.appelt |
Maintainer: | tgirod (daniel.appelt) |
Last Packager: | tgirod |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2017-08-17 16:45 |
Last Updated: | 2021-01-04 14:59 |
Dependencies (9)
- alsa-lib (alsa-lib-x205ta, alsa-lib-git, alsa-lib-minimal-git, alsa-lib-a52pcm)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-multilib-x32, fastgcc, gcc-libs-multilib-git, gcc-libs-git) (i686)
- gcc-libs-multilib (gcc-libs-multilib-x32, gcc-libs-multilib-git, gcc-libs-git, gcc-libs) (x86_64)
- gtk3 (gtk3-donnatella, gtk3-cosy, gtk3-adwaita-3-32-git, gtk3-mushrooms, gtk3-typeahead, gtk3-git, gtk3-ubuntu, gtk3-classic, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-view)
- libxss
- libxtst
- nss (nss-hg)
- npm (npm53, npm4, nodejs6-bin) (make)
- python-rtmidi (optional) – send and receive midi messages
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
daniel.appelt commented on 2020-11-02 21:07
@tgirod, I have now switched the PKGBUILD logic back to basically how it was before you took over. For me, a clean build works. Please report back if you see any problems. Updating to a new upstream version should in general be as simple as it has been in your PKGBUILD.
tgirod commented on 2020-11-02 09:50
@daniel.appelt you're on board!
daniel.appelt commented on 2020-11-02 09:48
@tgirod, you could add me as a co-maintainer. I think this would be a good model as I only get to work on AUR packages from time to time.
tgirod commented on 2020-11-02 09:40
@daniel.appelt you seem to know this quite well, do you want to take over maintenance?
daniel.appelt commented on 2020-11-01 13:35
@tgirod, I think you need some more logic in order to have proper support for architectures besides x86_64 (cf. build function in the last version of PKGBUILD before you took over). Furthermore, rsync hasn't been used by me.
tgirod commented on 2020-10-22 10:21
yes, rsync is for the recursive copy. honestly I didn't think it through, rsync was there from the previous maintainer's version. I guess rsync might be doing a better job of preserving links and rights? Don't know, I have to check.
cyberic commented on 2020-10-22 07:58
Hello @tgirod!
Thanks for taking ownership over this package!
are use using rsync just to do a recursive copy?
can't it be replaced with 'cp' ?
tgirod commented on 2020-10-22 07:47
updated, reused your switch case for the architecture. I don't have access to any other platform than x86_64, if anyone can test.
tgirod commented on 2020-10-22 07:19
I'll check the dependencies. As for the architectures, I just have to find a way to do it.
daniel.appelt commented on 2020-10-20 08:22
I think the specified dependencies are not correct. As far as I know upstream switched to python-rtmidi long time ago. Furthermore, bringing back support for architectures besided x86_64 would be nice.