Package Details: octopi-dev 0.9.0-10

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: octopi-dev
Description: A powerful Pacman frontend using Qt5 libs
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: octopi
Provides: octopi, octopi-cachecleaner, octopi-repoeditor
Submitter: matmoul
Maintainer: matmoul
Last Packager: matmoul
Votes: 45
Popularity: 33.35
First Submitted: 2019-07-29 21:29
Last Updated: 2019-11-19 21:00

Dependencies (13)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

matmoul commented on 2019-11-18 12:07

@kinoe Thanks for your return but it seem not a packaging issue...

Try to open an issue on

kinoe commented on 2019-11-18 06:10

@matmoul thanks for your work. Terminal looks like this: It seems octopi-dev is using xterm (export TERM=xterm)? In bash i'm using powerline as a statusline plugin thats seen in the xterminal

matmoul commented on 2019-10-20 20:57

@egrupled After investigation, I've used the manjaro PKGBUILD, I'll remove clang for the next release.

egrupled commented on 2019-10-19 12:28

@matmoul I don't see clang mentioned in upstream PKGBUILD:

matmoul commented on 2019-10-18 23:45

@egrupled For clang, I've started with the PKGBUILD of the official project... I don't know if clang is needed, need investigation, thanks...

egrupled commented on 2019-10-18 10:09

@matmoul I have another question - why clang?

egrupled commented on 2019-10-17 21:39

@matmoul I think it's easier and more modernish to always use git either for release or for specific commit but it's your call.

matmoul commented on 2019-10-17 20:54

@egrupled Yes, octopi-dev isn't octopi-git, it's the prerelease for octopi 0.10.0 and when the release will ready, it will best to use a tarball (git is a supplementary build dependency)

egrupled commented on 2019-10-17 20:48

@matmoul is there a reason why you are using tarball as source instead of git?

matmoul commented on 2019-08-12 21:38

@thisischrys I've removed pacman-contrib for this package because this is now a required dependency of alpm_octopi_utils