Package Details: nzbhydra2 3.14.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nzbhydra2
Description: Search aggregator for newznab and torznab indexers.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: fryfrog
Maintainer: fryfrog
Last Packager: fryfrog
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.000073
First Submitted: 2018-01-06 20:01
Last Updated: 2021-04-11 17:01

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

fryfrog commented on 2020-05-08 20:21

The wrapper we use comes right from the package, so it is the latest. I've seen reports of it on Discord, something is wrong. I did notice that there is a Python 3 version of the wrapper... so I switched to that w/ this package. But the error persists.

dcipha commented on 2020-05-08 19:41

Receiving "Outdated wrapper detected" popup after upgrading to 2.21.0-1

The NZBHydra wrapper (i.e. the executable or python script you use to run NZBHydra) seems to be outdated. Please update it: Shut down NZBHydra, download the latest version and extract it into your main NZBHydra folder. Start NZBHydra again.

eta-carinae commented on 2019-02-12 11:45

The checksum for doesn't match.

fryfrog commented on 2018-08-18 14:10

@binhex: It looks like the current java-runtime-headless=8 isn't actually limiting it to 8?

I've got a commit that forces it to java 10 via environment file. But maybe I should leave it up to the user? :/

binhex commented on 2018-08-18 10:29

A quick heads up for you @fryfrog the main developer is moving over to Java 10 and this has now been implemented so you will need to modify your package to include Java 10

fryfrog commented on 2018-08-10 15:42

@nicoulaj: I just verified URLs and ran makepkg -fsri and didn't get any errors. The URL you posted as a trailing / that shouldn't be there. Did you accidentally modify the PKGBUILD?

nicoulaj commented on 2018-08-10 13:04

I get this message during post-transaction hooks when installing this package: fatal: repository '' not found

binhex commented on 2018-07-31 20:32

@fryfrog thanks, docker image built fine now after change.

fryfrog commented on 2018-07-31 19:56

I versioned the wrapper script, should fix this going forward. :/

binhex commented on 2018-07-31 19:30

@fryfrog seeing the following with latest package:-

?[91m ... ?[0m ?[91mFAILED

Looks like checksum is wrong for this file now.