Package Details: nvidia-dkms-performance 465.24.02-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-dkms-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-dkms-performance
Description: NVIDIA driver sources for linux with some optimizations
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Keywords: dkms driver nvidia performance
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: nvidia, nvidia-dkms
Provides: NVIDIA-MODULE, nvidia=465.24.02, nvidia-dkms=465.24.02, nvidia-dkms-performance=465.24.02
Submitter: Cabopust
Maintainer: Cabopust
Last Packager: Cabopust
Votes: 4
Popularity: 1.88
First Submitted: 2021-01-22 18:42
Last Updated: 2021-04-17 10:54

Required by (43)

Sources (7)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

Cabopust commented on 2021-04-17 10:56

@Miromed I upgraded the package to branch 465.

Cabopust commented on 2021-04-17 09:38

Sorry for the delay, I will update the package to the 465 branch today.

Cabopust commented on 2021-04-17 09:37

@nariox Sorry for the delay, and thanks for finding this patch! I tested the path through NV_REGISTRY_DWORDS, but unfortunately it doesn't work. Changing the nvidia-drv.so library file, on the other hand, requires significant changes in PKGBUILD, because currently nvidia-dkms-performance only contains DKMS modules, while on the nvidia-utils side of the package all libraries remain untouched. I was already thinking about creating a completely standalone package (i.e. having its own nvidia-utils-performance, opencl-nvidia-performance, etc.) to avoid nvidia-utils dependencies from archlinux repositories and the corresponding conflicts. When I have a bit more time, I'll probably do that and think about how to accept this patch from pkgbuild.

nariox commented on 2021-04-17 00:50

But thank you for looking into it. Since the patch needs to happen on nvidia_drv.so, I don't think there's anything we could do on the source side (but I could be wrong).

I have been using nvidia-xrun to start a second Xorg instance and setting my overclocking from there. It's ugly and boring, but it works. Next, I hope to be able to automate that with a specially crafted .xinitrc.

Do you have a repo to follow the development of these patches?

nariox commented on 2021-04-16 17:14

I found it, it was version specific and pretty hacky. I doubt it is something "evil", but maintaining it would probably be impossible:

https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/option-coolbits-is-not-used-optimus-enabled-laptop-running-an-rtx-2070-manjaro-linux/111771/2

Cabopust commented on 2021-04-06 09:00

@nariox Perhaps, I think we should dig into the NV_REGISTRY_DWORDS registry setting. This was the case with the Nvidia Powermizer setup patch, and maybe it also applies to the Coolbits setup. I'll check it out when I have a little more free time.

Cabopust commented on 2021-04-06 08:43

@nariox, I have not found such a patch for the Nvidia kernel modules, but if I do I will definitely add it to the package as an optional option. If anyone can help with finding it, please let me know. Thanks.

nariox commented on 2021-04-05 14:08

I remember seeing one hex patch to enable Coolbits without messing with Xorg.conf (helpful for PRIME and headless setups). Does anyone here know where I could find it?

Cabopust commented on 2021-04-03 09:44

So, I tightened the nvidia-utils version dependency and now nvidia-dkms-performance version = nvidia-utils version.

Cabopust commented on 2021-04-03 09:10

@Miromed, он и не должен работать с nvidia-utils-beta, т.к. DKMS модули драйвера здесь ещё до сих пор версии 460. Пакет синхронизируется с обновлениями nvidia-utils из extra репозитория Arch Linux. Ветка драйвера 465 находиться все ещё в стадии Beta и не имеет стабильных выпусков, поэтому пакет nvidia-utils в Arch все ещё версии 460 ветки драйвера. Пакет будет обновлен до 465 драйвера тогда, когда будет обновлен nvidia-utils. И да, пожалуйста пишите здесь на английском языке, чтобы другие люди здесь могли нас понять.