Search Criteria
Package Details: ncmpcpp-git 2:0.8.2.r2.g81cb7a4f-2
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ncmpcpp-git.git (read-only) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | ncmpcpp-git |
| Description: | An almost exact clone of ncmpc with some new features (git version) |
| Upstream URL: | https://rybczak.net/ncmpcpp/ |
| Licenses: | |
| Conflicts: | |
| Provides: | |
| Submitter: | rich_o |
| Maintainer: | dbermond |
| Last Packager: | dbermond |
| Votes: | 108 |
| Popularity: | 0.003173 |
| First Submitted: | 2008-08-18 16:31 |
| Last Updated: | 2018-12-31 14:41 |
Dependencies (8)
- boost-libs
- curl (curl-http2-git, curl-git)
- fftw (fftw-mpich, fftw-mpi)
- libmpdclient
- ncurses (ncurses-nohex)
- taglib (taglib-git)
- boost (make)
- git (git-git) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »
dbermond commented on 2018-06-11 00:58
@bonob Yes. Users should rebuild this package at each new release of boost-libs.
bonob commented on 2018-06-09 06:13
I believe it needs to be rebuilt for boost-libs 1.67.0
rich_o commented on 2017-11-16 09:09
As development of ncmpcpp is not that fast paced anymore, ncmpcpp in community is sufficient for me. So I will disown this package at the end of the year. Anyone with interest to take over, please let me know. Thanks.
rich_o commented on 2017-07-28 10:26
@ayekat: Thank you for your comment, just updated the package with your suggestions.
ayekat commented on 2017-06-22 09:29
I think the PKGBUILD is missing a `provides=('ncmpcpp')`.
I use a meta-package to handle applications on my desktop machines, and this way the 'ncmpcpp' dependency would be correctly satisfied by ncmpcpp-git.
EDIT: Also, the upstream URL should probably be changed to http://rybczak.net/ncmpcpp/
Anonymous comment on 2017-05-30 12:15
Since the last update, I got the error:
ncmpcpp: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_filesystem.so.1.63.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I think there was an update to `boost` or `libboost` and it makes the binary file broken. The solution, As suggested here: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=208105, is to rebuild the package.
Anonymous comment on 2016-11-05 20:42
Works wonderfully now, thanks for the quick fix!
rich_o commented on 2016-11-05 19:38
@SummerRainbowz: Damn. No, you're not the only one. I'll upload a fixed PKGBUILD within a few minutes. Thanks!
Anonymous comment on 2016-11-05 19:28
The visualizer isn't working for me (was working before I updated). How about you guys?
rich_o commented on 2016-11-05 18:07
@all: sorry for the long wait.
@lukasm: it was not needed until recently.