Arch Linux User Repository

This package will verify the signature of the git tag. Developer keys are available here and instructions are here. See the PKGBUILD to determine which developer key you need.

This package will verify the signature of the git tag. Developer keys are available here and instructions are here. See the PKGBUILD to determine which developer key you need.

@jpprovost: This package should have been created as mullvad-vpn-bin to begin with since it was a binary source.

All official Arch packages are built from source code. The packages installed via Pacman are already built by the package maintainers, but AUR packages are up to users to build. See the Arch Build System wiki entry for more info.

@yochananmarqos: I didn't know that. It's an important change. Is there a reason for this modification?

Thanks for the quick reply by the way.

@jpprovost: I takes awhile because it now builds from source code. The precompiled binary package is mullvad-vpn-bin. You can install that if you prefer quicker updates.

Is it normal that it takes so long to build ? It took me about 20+ minutes... I have no memories of such a long time to update this package...

Am I the only one?

Can confirm, built and installed successfully.

Thanks.

It builds! I mean it this time. Let me know if I missed anything.

@dbirks: Thank you, that helps. EDIT: I think I just figured out what the problem is, rebuilding now...

@yochananmarqos I haven't fully tested this, but while working on building this from source last week, this is what I got. I added dist-assets/binaries to the init to skip grabbing the windows-specific sources. Hopefully it helps some:

source=("git+https://github.com/mullvad/mullvadvpn-app.git#tag=$pkgver"
        "git+https://github.com/mullvad/mullvadvpn-app-binaries.git")

prepare() {
  # Point the submodule to our local copy
  cd mullvadvpn-app
  git submodule init dist-assets/binaries
  git config submodule.mullvadvpn-app-binaries.url "$srcdir/mullvadvpn-app-binaries"
  git submodule update
}

I can reproduce the error, I'll work on it.

@coderobe: Oh, I see what you mean. I'll do some research about it.