Search Criteria
Package Details: moonscript 0.5.0_1-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/moonscript.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | moonscript |
Description: | A programmer friendly language that compiles to Lua |
Upstream URL: | http://moonscript.org |
Licenses: | |
Submitter: | xyproto |
Maintainer: | caleb |
Last Packager: | jahiy |
Votes: | 8 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2011-08-11 12:49 |
Last Updated: | 2016-11-04 11:51 |
Dependencies (7)
- luarocks
- lua-lpeg>=0.10
- lua-alt-getopt>=0.7
- lua-filesystem>=1.5
- lua>=5.1
- curl (curl-git, curl-minimal-git) (make)
- git (git-git) (make)
Required by (4)
- aegisub-dependency-control (make)
- lua-sitegen-git
- mooni
- mpv-webm-git (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
FichteFoll commented on 2020-08-17 16:06
lua-alt-getopt
(andlua53-alt-getopt
) has been updated, butmoonc
still fails because it tries to load itself from 5.4 while its libraries are installed into the 5.3 folder and can't importmoonscript.cmd.moonc
. Pinning the 5.3 executable and folder (using the same command as in my previous comment) then fails because it can't importlfs
.FichteFoll commented on 2020-08-11 16:23
Apparently broken since Lua was updated to 5.4. No idea how to fix, personally.
alt_getopt
on start, which isn't available for 5.4 yet, it seems (https://luarocks.org/modules/mpeterv/alt-getopt).module
being nil.Edit: Submitted a task https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/67556.
m040601 commented on 2020-06-07 01:20
Is there any reason for this package's PKGBUILD to only include x86 architecture ?
Could you add arm architecture to it ? "armv7h" "armv6h" etc
I'm trying to build some mpv scripts, https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mpv-webm-git, which depend on 'moonscript'
moonscript dependencies:
are all available on Arch Linux Arm
so there should be no reason for moonscript not to work there
minus commented on 2016-07-23 19:56
Checksum of index.html doesn't match. Using checksums on non-versioned files is too fragile imho
dluciv commented on 2016-03-13 09:32
Moreover, everything except rockspec file fails to match.
Those files do not affect security directly, I suggest to just change their checksums to 'SKIP'.
wenLiangcan commented on 2014-08-07 12:46
The checksum of file README.md should be update to d9e055952371e6d23d47459da59f8c517929e65b9e27e55f82e7a1c3051cfdea
xyproto commented on 2014-08-06 09:37
Updated to 0.2.6.
xyproto commented on 2014-08-06 09:30
Thanks, will update. Just flagging the package as out-of-date also works.
truh commented on 2014-08-05 11:38
Looks like you have to update the validity checks.
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
moonscript-dev-1.rockspec ... Passed
README.md ... FAILED
reference.md ... FAILED
index.html ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build moonscript.
xyproto commented on 2014-05-31 21:57
Updated the package, thanks wenLiangcan. If you want to adopt it, please let me know. You seem to care about this one, which is great.