Package Details: mkpasswd 5.5.10-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mkpasswd
Description: Tool for creating password hashes suitable for /etc/shadow
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: julianbrost
Maintainer: julianbrost
Last Packager: julianbrost
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.004245
First Submitted: 2017-08-09 22:55
Last Updated: 2021-07-17 10:34

Latest Comments

Freso commented on 2021-05-23 12:44

Maybe mkpasswd.whois could be an acceptable alternative binary name? Denotes where the binary is from and distinguishes it from expect’s mkpasswd – while still appearing in tab completion from mkp….

julianbrost commented on 2019-09-19 08:52

@Anagastes: I think this question should have gone there, this is just a similarly named package:

Anagastes commented on 2019-09-16 16:21

How ca I fix this?

==> Beginne prepare()... /home/user/.cache/yay/makepasswd/PKGBUILD: Zeile 24: makepasswd_1.10-10.diff: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ==> FEHLER: Ein Fehler geschah in prepare().

victorbrca commented on 2019-07-08 15:52

Thank you for the explanation @julianbrost. I just looked at the PKGBUILD and Makefile and saw that it only installs 'mkpasswd'.

My apologies for wrongly filing it as outdated. I had the impression that something might be fishy with the package when I first looked at it.

julianbrost commented on 2019-07-06 15:41

@victorbrca The linked Github repo is indeed the correct one. For whatever reason, this mkpasswd program is maintained in the whois repo: See also Debian, where the mkpasswd binary is even part of the whois package:

victorbrca commented on 2019-07-06 15:03

I have this package installed on my system and the command 'mkpasswd' works, however, looking at the info page for the package the GitHub repo points to a repository that has nothing to do with the package (

When I google for 'mkpasswd' I find a repo that has been disowned ( and that user is no longer on GitHub.

This seems very fishy!

julianbrost commented on 2017-08-19 14:26

@chimo Thanks for the hint, I didn't notice that. Do you or anyone else have any suggestions for renaming the file? That sounds more preferable to me than just adding a conflict to the package.

chimo commented on 2017-08-12 02:33

I think this conflicts with the "expect" package, which also provides a `mkpasswd` binary: