Package Details: linux-rt-headers 5.2.9_rt3-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: linux-rt
Description: Header files and scripts for building modules for Linux-rt kernel
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: schivmeister
Maintainer: jhernberg (dvzrv)
Last Packager: dvzrv
Votes: 159
Popularity: 1.480132
First Submitted: 2011-08-09 20:03
Last Updated: 2019-08-18 19:06

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

jhernberg commented on 2019-08-19 07:43

In fact lately the process started to bring the rt patchset into the main kernel, so hopefully in the not too distant future it will just be another config option and no longer a set of out of tree patches.

Det commented on 2019-08-18 16:40

Great to see RT still around after reading "The future of RT-Linux?" question in

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2019-07-28 10:16

There's a thread at the Jack-Devel mailing list, that is interesting regarding Spectre mitigations and CONFIG_AUDIT, see advice on xruns. The subscriber is able to reduce frames/period from 24 to 12, take a look at this posting.

dvzrv commented on 2019-06-18 22:02

@microsoftenator: you're absolutely right! same goes for linux-rt-lts (had a false positive when grepping for BCACHE). Please forget what I wrote earlier! :)

microsoftenator commented on 2019-06-18 08:34

@dvzrv I'm pretty sure bcache is disabled for rt kernels

dvzrv commented on 2019-06-17 22:36

Please also note, that the current TCP based vulnerability in all kernels probably won't be patched in linux-rt, until it is ported to 5.1.x (as 5.0.x is EOL).

merlyn commented on 2019-06-11 18:18

5.0.19_rt is working for me. @Ralf thanks for the tip. @jhernberg and @dvzrv thanks for your work maintaining and packaging this!

jhernberg commented on 2019-05-17 08:39

@merlyn: Yes, reporting your issue on the linux-rt-users mailing list is probably the best recourse!

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2019-05-16 15:39

merlyn, you should subscribe to the linux-rt-users discussion and bug reporting mailing list

merlyn commented on 2019-05-16 15:21

I tried 5.0.10_rt and I'm still getting the same error.