Package Details: lighttable-bin 0.8.1-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: lighttable-bin
Description: New interactive IDE that lets you modify running programs and embed anything from websites to games.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: trashstar
Maintainer: trashstar
Last Packager: trashstar
Votes: 188
Popularity: 0.000335
First Submitted: 2017-05-17 09:24
Last Updated: 2017-05-17 09:24

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... Next › Last »

Binero commented on 2014-07-25 21:32

How do I allow me to set lighttable as the default for specific files? I tried changing the exec line to "Exec=lighttable %U", which allows me to associate it with files I want, but it doesn't actually open the files through nautilus. (I hope this made sense)

lendle commented on 2014-06-05 19:48

@hobarrera: That did the trick, thanks!

WhyNotHugo commented on 2014-06-05 19:39

@zidarsk8: Odd. Try rebuilding, and check all the output. Sounds like you're missing some files, but I can't guess why. :-/

@lendle: Updated dependencies. Also deleted some redundant ones.

@carstene1ns: Huh. I wonder why it build fine so far. My bad. Fixed now anyway.

carstene1ns commented on 2014-06-04 19:52

As said the 32 bit and 64 bit source tarballs seem interchanged. So it can not find the lib32 libraries under x86_64.
'file /opt/LightTable/ltbin' and 'uname -m' will tell you, if you have the right executable for your architecture.

lendle commented on 2014-06-04 18:35

When I try to start lighttable 0.6.6-1, I get

/opt/LightTable/ltbin: error while loading shared libraries: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I have the gconf package installed, and is in /usr/lib. If I switch back to 0.6.5-1, lighttable starts.

zidarsk8 commented on 2014-06-04 13:06

I'm getting:
/usr/bin/lighttable: line 14: /opt/LightTable/ltbin: No such file or directory

a fev versions back reinstalling is suppose to work, but not any more.

carstene1ns commented on 2014-06-03 20:20

Well, you currently check for i686 and then use 64 bit version, which seems wrong.

WhyNotHugo commented on 2014-06-03 20:02

@dundee That version doesn't work for me. The uploaded one works fine.
There is no separate x86_64 section in the uploaded one, better check that.

dundee commented on 2014-06-03 18:42

Section for x86_64 is not working. Here is patched version:

larsoyvind commented on 2014-06-03 18:10

@hobarrera That was quick, thanks!