@leo95 I agree that a merge with gtk3-nocsd-git would be beneficial. I have no clue whether the admins of the AUR have to take care of that or what to do, though.
Search Criteria
Package Details: lib32-libgtk3-nocsd-git r72.4e1c45d-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/lib32-libgtk3-nocsd-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | lib32-libgtk3-nocsd-git |
Description: | A hack to disable gtk+ 3 client side decoration (32-bit library) |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/ZaWertun/gtk3-nocsd |
Licenses: | |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | Kodehawa |
Last Packager: | Kodehawa |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.101104 |
First Submitted: | 2017-10-21 13:18 |
Last Updated: | 2020-11-14 17:58 |
Dependencies (6)
- gtk3 (gtk3-donnatella, gtk3-cosy, gtk3-adwaita-3-32-git, gtk3-mushrooms, gtk3-git, gtk3-ubuntu, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-view, gtk3-typeahead, gtk3-no_deadkeys_underline, gtk3-classic)
- gtk3-nocsd-git
- gcc-multilib (gcc-multilib-x32, gcc-multilib-git, gcc-git, gcc) (make)
- git (git-git) (make)
- gobject-introspection (gobject-introspection-git) (make)
- lib32-glib2 (lib32-glib2-git) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
Kodehawa commented on 2021-02-23 19:10
Kodehawa commented on 2020-11-14 17:59
Adopted the package and fixed build. This package fixes the issue of ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libgtk3-nocsd.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded
on packages that use/call 32-bit libraries, so you might want to always install it alongside gtk3-nocsd-git
The package name isn't exactly consistent with the other package now, but it's ok.
Anonymous comment on 2018-10-23 11:36
Since I don't use Arch Linux anymore, I can't test this package, so I disowned the package.
Pinned Comments
Kodehawa commented on 2020-11-14 17:59
Adopted the package and fixed build. This package fixes the issue of
ld.so: object '/usr/lib/libgtk3-nocsd.so.0' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be preloaded
on packages that use/call 32-bit libraries, so you might want to always install it alongside gtk3-nocsd-gitThe package name isn't exactly consistent with the other package now, but it's ok.