Package Details: keystore-explorer 5.4.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/keystore-explorer.git (read-only)
Package Base: keystore-explorer
Description: a free GUI replacement for the Java command-line utilities keytool, jarsigner and jadtool
Upstream URL: http://www.keystore-explorer.org/
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: teekay
Maintainer: teekay (urcadox)
Last Packager: urcadox
Votes: 16
Popularity: 0.001021
First Submitted: 2012-08-31 10:18
Last Updated: 2018-10-29 10:17

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

FranklinYu commented on 2018-11-13 06:06

@urcadox I asked in IRC channel, and users suggest that we shall directly convert this package to a build-from-source one (as 5.4.1-2), and then create a new package. The new package can be cloned from this one so that it keeps the build script history, but essentially it's just a new package (so keystore-explorer-bin release will start from 5.4.1-1).

urcadox commented on 2018-08-27 13:09

@FranklinYu That would make sense indeed. Not sure how to do this properly though.

FranklinYu commented on 2018-07-16 20:38

This is a binary package; KSE is GPL so we can actually build from source, and move this package to keystore-explorer-bin.

teekay commented on 2018-04-16 14:26

@urcadox: done! Thank you.

urcadox commented on 2018-04-16 14:10

@teekay Feel free to add me as a co-maintainer. :)

denisfalqueto commented on 2017-11-08 13:57

@teekey, no problem! I feel your pain, as I maintain some packages and always have to do it at home.

teekay commented on 2017-11-08 10:22

Sorry for the delay. The fact that AUR's git+https is readonly makes things hard for me in a corporate network.

Anyone wants to co-maintain or take over the package, btw?

denisfalqueto commented on 2017-11-07 00:44

This package seems to be orphan. Please, @teekay, reply in short term or I'll ask for orphaning.

FranklinYu commented on 2017-11-01 21:38

Now the issue mentioned by @denisfalqueto no longer affects, because 5.3.1 (531) has been released.

FranklinYu commented on 2017-10-09 21:43

@denisfalqueto Good observation. 5.3 being 530 seems weird, since 5.0 => 50, 5.1 => 51, 5.2 => 52, according to the GitHub release history. Author's pattern is confusing.