Package Details: jdk7 7u80-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk7.git (read-only)
Package Base: jdk7
Description: Oracle Java 7 Development Kit (public release - end of support)
Upstream URL: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/jdk7-downloads-1880260.html
Keywords: java-environment-jdk java-openjfx java-runtime-headless-jre java-runtime-jre java-web-start-jre
Licenses: custom
Provides: java-environment=7, java-environment-jdk=7, java-openjfx=7, java-runtime=7, java-runtime-headless=7, java-runtime-headless-jre=7, java-runtime-jre=7, java-web-start=7, java-web-start-jre=7
Submitter: joschi
Maintainer: severach
Last Packager: Det
Votes: 136
Popularity: 0.157919
First Submitted: 2013-09-11 18:22
Last Updated: 2017-11-15 21:56

Dependencies (9)

Required by (1000)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... Next › Last »

galaux commented on 2014-10-05 13:16

FYI, current package "java-common" will be split due to https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41883

The only changes needed will be:
- for java-runtime-headless providing packages to now depend on "java-runtime-common" rather than "java-common"
- for java-environment providing packages to now depend on "java-environment-common"

These new packages are expected to be pushed to extra next week-end.

galaux commented on 2014-10-05 12:17

FYI, chances are current package "java-common" will be split due to https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/41883

tsachev commented on 2014-10-02 16:37

please copy the src.zip file to /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-oracle

tsachev commented on 2014-10-02 16:16

I do not think that (jmc) mission control is included in jdk7. isn't it only in the java 8 package?
And merging with jdk7 will be very good. It is annoying to have jdk for java 8 and jdk7-oracle for java 7.

Det commented on 2014-09-11 15:57

Well, it wasn't chosen, right?

basinilya commented on 2014-09-10 06:39

That post doesn't tell what convention was chosen. In fact, I hardly understand its manner.

Det commented on 2014-09-10 02:27

That's fine. My response: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-September/029499.html

Anonymous comment on 2014-09-09 22:23

ok, again this thread is for the naming issue:
https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-September/029497.html
Pleas come to a conclission to this nameing differences.

Anonymous comment on 2014-09-09 22:22

For the naimg issue I bring this thread: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2014-September/029497.html

Det commented on 2014-09-09 16:25

So just relaying the same thing here: because the path for OpenJDK 8 was chosen as '/usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk' (java-<major version>-<project name>), I simply preferred making mine 'java-8-jdk' (not 'java-8-oracle'), because the actual name of the project is 'JDK', not 'Oracle JDK', and it also creates consistency with the man pages:

$ man java-openjdk8
$ man java-jdk8

Instead of:

$ man java-openjdk8
$ man java8-oracle

Which also made me change the following dependencies:

- java-runtime-headless-oracle
- java-runtime-oracle
- java-web-start-oracle
- java-environment-oracle

to:

- java-runtime-headless-jre
- java-runtime-jre
- java-web-start-jre
- java-environment-jdk (a JDK component)

Even if all of those end up being '-jdk' for "simplicity", I'd still prefer that setup, than the whole excessive "Oracle" tagging. The 'java8-oracle' (jre8-oracle/jdk8-oracle) package was already replaced with my implementation, so I assume the devs think it's fine as long as it works and doesn't conflict.

However, you're part of the whole Java scheme in Arch also, so I'd like your input on this as well so we can reach a consensus on the standard.