Search Criteria
Package Details: jcryptool 0.9.9-3
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/jcryptool.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | jcryptool |
| Description: | e-learning application for applying and analysing cryptographic algorithms |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.cryptool.org/en/jcryptool |
| Licenses: | |
| Submitter: | None |
| Maintainer: | None |
| Last Packager: | eschwartz |
| Votes: | 18 |
| Popularity: | 0.000033 |
| First Submitted: | 2010-02-19 17:33 |
| Last Updated: | 2017-11-29 01:39 |
Dependencies (4)
- fontconfig (fontconfig-srb, fontconfig-infinality-ultimate, fontconfig-ubuntu, fontconfig-infinality, fontconfig-infinality-remix, fontconfig-git)
- java-runtime (jdk5, tuxjdk, jre7-openjdk-infinality, java-8-openjdk-shenandoah, jre8-openjdk-infinality, java-gcj-compat, jdk9, jre9, jdk-devel, jre10, jdk8-arm64, jdk6, jdk12-openj9-bin, zulu-12-bin, jre6, jre12, jdk8-openjdk-dcevm, jdk11-graalvm-ee-bin, zulu-13-bin, jdk8-jetbrains, server-jre, jdk8-arm, jdk13-openj9-bin, jdk9-openj9-bin, jdk10, jdk11-openjdk-dcevm, jre8-openjdk-jetbrains, jre8-openjdk-shenandoah, jdk10-openj9-bin, jetbrains-jre8, liberica-jdk-11-bin, liberica-jdk-11-full-bin, liberica-jdk-11-lite-bin, liberica-jdk-full-bin, liberica-jre-11-bin, liberica-jre-11-full-bin, jdk11-adoptopenjdk, zulu-11-bin, zulu-8-bin, zulu-14-bin, amazon-corretto-11, jdk-openj9-bin, jdk14-openj9-bin, jdk11-openj9-bin, java-openjdk-bin, sapmachine-jdk-bin, jre11, jdk7, jre7, jre8, jdk8, liberica-jdk-8-full-bin, amazon-corretto-8, jre-openj9, jdk8-j9-bin, jdk7-j9-bin, jdk7r1-j9-bin, zulu-embedded-jdk8, jetbrains-jre, java-openjdk-loom-ea-bin, jdk8-graalvm-bin, jdk11-graalvm-bin, jdk8-openj9-bin, jdk-arm, jre8-adoptopenjdk, zulu-embedded-jdk11, jre, java-openjdk-ea-bin, jdk-adoptopenjdk, jdk-jetbrains, jre-openjdk, jre11-openjdk, jre7-openjdk, jre8-openjdk)
- libxext (libxext-git)
- libxrender
Required by (0)
Sources (10)
- https://www.cryptool.org/jctdownload/Builds/downloads/stable/jcryptool-0.9.9-linux.gtk.x86.tar.gz (i686)
- https://www.cryptool.org/jctdownload/Builds/downloads/stable/jcryptool-0.9.9-linux.gtk.x86_64.tar.gz (x86_64)
- jcryptool-128.png
- jcryptool-16.png
- jcryptool-24.png
- jcryptool-256.png
- jcryptool-32.png
- jcryptool-48.png
- jcryptool-512.png
- jcryptool.desktop
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
dbrgn commented on 2020-04-29 11:43
The 32bit version doesn't seem to be offered anymore. This cleaned up PKGBUILD seems to do the trick:
https://gist.github.com/dbrgn/b7f7f219604d3535041b7fb78c3c83fc
dbrgn commented on 2020-04-29 11:29
eschwartz: Could you update or orphan this package? Needs update, the 0.9.9 version is not online anymore :)
ylhn15 commented on 2019-04-23 09:53
Package needs to be updated to version 0.9.10
http://www.cryptool.org/jctdownload/Builds/downloads/stable/jcryptool-0.9.9-linux.gtk.x86_64.tar.gz
Should be:
http://www.cryptool.org/jctdownload/Builds/downloads/stable/jcryptool-0.9.10-linux.gtk.x86_64.tar.gz
NonerKao commented on 2016-09-02 10:15
@Hoeman42
Thanks!
Hoeman42 commented on 2016-09-02 06:22
Broken link:
http://www.cryptool.org/jctdownload/Builds/downloads/stable/jcryptool-0.9.9-linux.gtk.x86_64.tar.gz
should be
http://www.cryptool.org/jctdownload/Builds/downloads/weekly/jcryptool-0.9.9-linux.gtk.x86_64.tar.gz
NonerKao commented on 2016-04-27 16:39
@Commod0re
fixed, thanks!
Commod0re commented on 2016-04-27 04:23
==> Validating source files with sha512sums...
jcryptool-0.9.9-linux.gtk.x86_64.tar.gz ... FAILED
jcryptool.desktop ... Passed
jcryptool.png ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
jcryptool*.pkg.tar.xz
NonerKao commented on 2016-04-04 03:05
change source from stable to weekly,
update to version 0.9.9,
remove "epoch" variable,
add dependency "glibc".
akurei commented on 2016-02-24 19:03
Disowning.
Babiol commented on 2014-03-01 09:08
When I start jcryptool I have the following message :
Could not find a valid configurations for Intro Part: intro element" in extension: org.eclipseui.intro in Bundle: org.jcryptool.core
Check error Log View for details.
Any idea where this come from ?