Package Details: htop-solarized 2.2.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/htop-solarized.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: htop-solarized
Description: Interactive process viewer with solarized patch
Upstream URL: http://hisham.hm/htop/
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: htop
Provides: htop
Submitter: None
Maintainer: lrustand
Last Packager: lrustand
Votes: 35
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2013-02-21 00:02
Last Updated: 2019-07-29 15:35

Dependencies (4)

Required by (6)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2

lenovomi commented on 2014-07-08 18:03

yes, i can take a look but i dont know for which values i have to set it.

orschiro commented on 2014-07-04 21:50

@lenovomi

Have you already looked into the patch and see if you can change the values for some of the colour codes?

lenovomi commented on 2014-07-04 18:08

Load average value is not visible, then user "root" for processes which are running under root. Numbers for indicating SWAP usage/total are broken too.

lenovomi commented on 2014-07-04 17:49

Its impossible to read Load average value, impossible to read user "root" for processes which are running under root. Numbers for indicating SWAP usage/total are broken too.

orschiro commented on 2014-07-02 19:58

@lenovomi

Unfortunately I use Solarized Light but on your screenshot I cannot see anything being broken.

Can you precisely describe what you consider as broken?

lenovomi commented on 2014-06-30 20:42

sure, here u go:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kwph1pl83900utc/htop.png

orschiro commented on 2014-06-30 13:03

@lenovomi

Can you show a screenshot of how it looks like on your machine?

Just for comparison.

Thanks!

lenovomi commented on 2014-06-29 23:09

I downloaded tar.gz and compiled it on ubuntu, the colors are still broken with dark theme, any idea why? Im starting htop as user with uid != 0, I cant see numbers in SWP area and cant read user ROOT per each process. Thanks

orschiro commented on 2014-05-12 16:47

Thanks for this package! Resolved an issue with unreadable font because it was too bright.