Arch Linux User Repository

fails in prepare(): rename: *_nb.ts: not accessible

@sikmir abandoning, thank you for taking care of it from now on. j

@jose1711 Please, update the follow ones: depends=('qt5-base') makedepends=('git' 'qt5-tools') optdepends=('qt5-imageformats: Support for TIFF') conflicts=(${_pkgname}) provides=("${_pkgname}=${pkgver}")

remove gpxsee.desktop from source.

pkgver() { cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}"

RELEASE="$(git describe --tags $(git rev-list --tags --max-count=1))" REVISION="$(git rev-list --count HEAD).$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)" printf "%s.r%s" "${RELEASE}" "${REVISION}" }

I've added stable version: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gpxsee. @jose1711 Please, add Conflicts/Provides fields.

Needs update:

==> Starting package()...
install: cannot stat '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-me/aur-gpxsee-git/src/gpxsee-git/pkg/maps.txt': No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build gpxsee-git.

@EasyToRemember thank you for finding out, fixed

the package sections should probably read (different source path, different destination path):

install -Dm644 ${srcdir}/${pkgname}/pkg/maps.txt ${pkgdir}/usr/share/gpxsee/maps.txt

tbh i can't really see a case where .desktop or icon can be distro-specific. keeping translations for instance included in desktop separately from upstream when one distribution differs from the other is not really wise i think. and sure, icon could include distribution logo but why would anyone do/want that.

thanks for pointing to spec files. i wasn't sure if/how csv files should be included, will fix it later today.

Well, the original idea behind not including those files to the source tree was that they might be distribution-specific.

Besides of the missing icon file, mime-type file and desktop file, this package is also missing the "ellipsoids.csv" and "datums.csv" files. Without them non-WGS84 maps do not work, so please include them to the package as well.
Generally - see the RPM spec file or DEB rules file for what needs to be part of a proper installation.

i stand corrected. why not to include in the source tree as well?