Package Details: ghostess 20120105-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ghostess.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ghostess
Description: a simple GTK host for DSSI plugins
Upstream URL: http://www.smbolton.com/linux.html
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: lee
Maintainer: lee
Last Packager: lee
Votes: 12
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2009-10-10 19:24
Last Updated: 2018-10-18 19:47

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

GuestOne commented on 2020-06-22 19:48

I am unable to compile. Here the log: https://ybin.me/p/a449812e32350d44#KfDJLgUGVyFsuuYKf4fKg4sOoqbNmQZMvks4cJKac64=

lee commented on 2016-09-06 21:37

I naively assumed ladspa would be covered via dssi but sure, you\'re right -- it\'s just a makedepends so the chain may be legally broken. tnx.

seanl commented on 2016-07-18 00:21

Needs to depend on ladspa. Complains about ladspa.h missing otherwise.

lee commented on 2012-01-06 11:08

@chapatt
Sorry, I just realised I hadn't uploaded the fix,
my mistake.

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-06 07:16

I just released an updated version that fixes this and a few other minor problems:

http://www.smbolton.com/linux/ghostess-20120105.tar.bz2

Lee, thanks in advance for updating the PKGBUILD.

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-06 00:52

It worked after I added

LDFLAGS="/lib/libm.so.6 /lib/libdl.so.2"

before ./configure.

Thanks!

lee commented on 2012-01-05 18:56

@chapatt
I had the same error recently, in respose to which I added
LDFLAGS+="/lib/libm.so.6 /lib/libdl.so.2"
to the ./configure line.
Could be that I didn't bump the version number, 'cause it
doesn't affect working installations.
So if your PKGBUILD doesn't contain that fix, then add it (or
re-download the source package) and try again. If this is not
the case, I'm clueless ATM.

Anonymous comment on 2012-01-05 18:03

I can't get it to compile. It looks like an error with "libm.so.6". Here's a copy of the terminal output http://pastebin.com/FzwTZAca.

Can anyone help? Thanks.

lee commented on 2011-03-14 10:00

oops, thanks. fixed now

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-14 07:42

eh...typo in source. smbolton.com, not smboltyon.com. :)