Package Details: g95 0.94-3

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: g95
Description: A stable, production Fortran 95 compiler available for multiple cpu architectures and operating systems
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Provides: g95
Submitter: None
Maintainer: drrossum
Last Packager: drrossum
Votes: 28
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2006-11-19 15:06
Last Updated: 2016-03-23 22:51

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

duca commented on 2010-07-29 01:57

Eothred, thanks for your input. I just corrected the pkgbuild stuff you mentionated.

I am not sure about the linking problem, but for x86_64 it didnt happen to me. Did you update the libstdc++, gcc and gcc-libs ?

Eothred commented on 2010-07-26 11:06

I get error when using the g95 that I don't understand (I've tried to google a bit, guess I'm not good enough googler yet). The following error message is given during linking:

/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.0/../../../ undefined reference to `_Unwind_GetIPInfo@GCC_4.2.0'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [madx] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/madx.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2

Anyone knows how to fix this? It seems to me I have an issue using libstdc++ because it is compiled for a different gcc version than what g95 uses?

Eothred commented on 2010-07-26 09:17

Found another issue as well. The symlink links to "i686-unknown-linux-gnu-g95" but the correct binary is called "i686-pc-linux-gnu-g95"

Eothred commented on 2010-07-26 09:09

That was the 32bit version btw.

Eothred commented on 2010-07-26 09:09

I don't think you need to specify the md5sum for the *.install file? Anyway, my point was just that the md5sum seems to be wrong in PKGBUILD.

$ makepkg -g
==> Retrieving Sources...
-> Found g95-x86-linux.tgz
==> Generating checksums for source files...


duca commented on 2010-06-15 20:51

thanks for your contribution rodprice. Compilation from source is a tough task, but the necessity to do it is an open subject. I particularly do not think that the local compiled version is in anyway better than the binary release.

rodprice commented on 2010-06-11 21:14

Would you also note that this package installs a binary, rather than compile the package from source? People should know this before they install, as the expectation for the AUR is that packages compile from source. BTW, after trying to compile g95 from source with Arch's latest gcc, I understand why you'd install the binary instead. :-)

rodprice commented on 2010-06-11 21:11

The g95 project periodically updates the file above (g95-x86_64-64-linux.tgz) without changing the name. They've updated to version 0.93, so this PKGBUILD breaks.

duca commented on 2010-05-21 19:23


duca commented on 2010-04-12 14:34

updated at 04-12-2010