Package Details: fslint 2.46-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: fslint
Description: Finds and clean various forms of lint on a filesystem
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: goodgerster
Last Packager: goodgerster
Votes: 303
Popularity: 0.29
First Submitted: 2007-02-24 01:42
Last Updated: 2020-10-23 11:03

Dependencies (2)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

stevenhoneyman commented on 2020-10-23 10:02

I no longer use Arch Linux so feel free to adopt

goodgerster commented on 2020-10-23 09:59

@thoth Out-of-date flagging is not for reporting any problem with the PKGBUILD other than it being out of date.

@stevenhoneyman If you can no longer maintain it, please orphan the package and I will adopt it. EDIT: That was fast. Thanks.

haawda commented on 2017-06-10 17:46

alfredo.ardito: your problem most certainly has nothing to do with fslint. gstreamer0.10-good-plugins has been removed from official repos. Get rid of it or use the AUR package for it.

alfredo.ardito commented on 2017-06-10 15:39

Error Building:

:: Running post-transaction hooks...
(1/2) Arming ConditionNeedsUpdate...
(2/2) Updating the desktop file MIME type cache...
error: missing 'libsoup-gnome' dependency for 'gstreamer0.10-good-plugins'

stevenhoneyman commented on 2014-06-09 19:33

Fixed. No more "index out of range" - it was a regression, then fixed shortly after the 2.44 release in upstream svn. Sadly, the author hasn't released 2.45 yet, so I've pulled out the relevant changes as patches.

stevenhoneyman commented on 2014-06-09 16:29

Thanks @Dragonlord :)
I'll get it sorted out

Dragonlord commented on 2014-06-09 16:13

go ahead adopting it

stevenhoneyman commented on 2014-06-06 16:53

(also, for other people to know)
Emailed the maintainer 4 days ago - I'd be happy to take over maintenance and fix this package... but no reply yet.

stevenhoneyman commented on 2014-06-06 16:52

flagged because it doesn't work properly (Index our of range error like other people said)

...also it shouldn't conflict with rpm package

thomasfb commented on 2014-06-02 07:10

Would be interesting to know exactly why it conflicts with rpm package.