Package Details: freshplayerplugin-git 0.3.9.r6.g58596f4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freshplayerplugin-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: freshplayerplugin-git
Description: PPAPI-host NPAPI-plugin adapter.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: freshplayerplugin
Submitter: Behem0th
Maintainer: WorMzy
Last Packager: WorMzy
Votes: 153
Popularity: 0.000001
First Submitted: 2014-03-31 20:10
Last Updated: 2019-02-01 23:57

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »

marcelhuber commented on 2014-07-01 11:54

There is another patch here with takes care of correct execute permissions: http://paste.mate-desktop.org/view/358dab41

intelfx commented on 2014-06-29 11:03

The upstream now provides several libraries; PKGBUILD needs to be updated to install those.

ix.io tells me HTTP 500, so:
ftp://intelfx.homenet.org/freshplayer-pkgbuild.patch

orschiro commented on 2014-06-18 13:52

@SanskritFritz

Thanks! I will mention it on the chromium-pepper-flash-dev AUR page.

SanskritFritz commented on 2014-06-18 11:41

@orschiro yes, exactly. This is the way to handle these kind of conflicts. All -dev, -beta -git, -svn etc packages should provide the base package, this way one can choose to use a dev package as dependency.

SanskritFritz commented on 2014-06-18 11:39

orschiro commented on 2014-06-18 11:38

@SanskritFritz

Thanks! So, the PKGBUILD [1] should contain a provide='chromium-pepper-flash' line?


[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ch/chromium-pepper-flash-dev/PKGBUILD

SanskritFritz commented on 2014-06-17 08:56

chromium-pepper-flash-dev should provide chromium-pepper-flash

orschiro commented on 2014-06-17 08:54

Is it possible to make the dependence on either chromium-pepper-flash or chromium-pepper-flash-dev?

I use chromium-pepper-flash-dev and don't want to remove it in favour of chromium-pepper-flash.

Behem0th commented on 2014-06-16 14:38

@WorMzy
>do you mean that I could edit the dependencies to suit my own needs?
Yes.
>make them available for everyone.
For this reason i include gtk2 in dependencies.
>I'm not sure what you mean by the last part of your message
Sorry for that. English not my lang and i use google translate. ;-(

WorMzy commented on 2014-06-16 13:38

Thank you very much. :D

I'm not sure what you mean by the last part of your message.. do you mean that I could edit the dependencies to suit my own needs? This is true, and if you didn't want to include the changes, I would accept this and maintain my own local PKGBUILD (as I do with several other packages). However, I feel it would be selfish of me to make such improvements and not try to make them available for everyone.