Package Details: freshplayerplugin-git 0.3.9.r6.g58596f4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freshplayerplugin-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: freshplayerplugin-git
Description: PPAPI-host NPAPI-plugin adapter.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/i-rinat/freshplayerplugin
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: freshplayerplugin
Submitter: Behem0th
Maintainer: WorMzy
Last Packager: WorMzy
Votes: 153
Popularity: 0.000001
First Submitted: 2014-03-31 20:10
Last Updated: 2019-02-01 23:57

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »

Behem0th commented on 2014-05-28 15:55

3nd version.

http://paste.kde.org/p0vk0uuvf

12eason commented on 2014-05-28 14:30

This discussion over chrome vs chromium is fairly pointless. Just do what the package chromium-pepper-flash does: download chrome to a tmp directory, extract pepperflash from the rpm and install it separately.

intelfx commented on 2014-05-28 14:23

@Behem0th, @orschiro:

That google spreadsheet link is apparently broken. However, here is statistics collected by 'pkgstats':
https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics

By grepping through the page, one may see that:
- chromium is 58.39 %
- google-chrome is 11.49 %
- google-chrome-beta is 1.46 %
- google-chrome-dev is 1.54 %
- chromium-pepper-flash is 10.59 %
- chromium-pepper-flash-stable is 4.98 %

So there are at worst 58.39% users of chromium (I did not count users of chromium-browser-bin and chromium-browser-svn), and at best 14.49% users of google-chrome.

More interestingly, 15.57% users of chromium-pepper-flash still beat 14.49% users of google-chrome.

I think this speaks for chromium-pepper-flash to be a definite default.

intelfx commented on 2014-05-28 14:20

@Behem0th, @orschiro:

That google spreadsheet link is apparently broken. However, here is statistics collected by 'pkgstats':
https://www.archlinux.de/?page=PackageStatistics

By grepping through the page, one may see that:
- chromium is 58.39 %
- google-chrome is 11.49 %
- google-chrome-beta is 1.46 %
- google-chrome-dev is 1.54 %

So there are at worst 47.8% users of chromium (I did not count users of chromium-browser-bin and chromium-browser-svn), and at best 14.49% users of google-chrome.

I think this speaks for chromium-pepper-flash to be a definite default.

intelfx commented on 2014-05-28 14:12

@Behem0th:
1. it's better to have a variable `_use_chromium=0` and to check it with `(( _use_chromium ))`, to indicate that there are only two choices (to use or not to use).
2. `if ... then depends=() else depends=() fi` is not good because it breaks ad-hoc PKGBUILD parsers which do not interpret Bash fully (just like it was before AUR 3.0.0). Specify a default depends=() array and then override it if desired, like this:

depends=('google-chrome' ...)
if (( _use_chromium )); then
depends[0]='chromium-pepper-flash'
fi

3. `install -d` in package() is redundant.

Behem0th commented on 2014-05-28 13:59

2nd version. I think this version more correct.

http://paste.kde.org/pnicg2xq2

Behem0th commented on 2014-05-28 13:45

@intelfx

What you think about this?

http://paste.kde.org/pkpf6ff8j

Behem0th commented on 2014-05-28 13:25

@orschiro

In this statistics i don't see google-chrome.

orschiro commented on 2014-05-27 22:47

@all

It seems that between Chromium and Chrome, Chromium is the one more widely used within the Arch Linux community:

https://spreadsheets.google.com/viewanalytics?key=0AnUlFfFTiA3xdEtJeTh4RHFEQXRHdVM1ZUNDbm9xMHc

intelfx commented on 2014-05-27 19:48

@Behem0th

OK. Since conditional/complex dependencies are not supported by makepkg/pacman (so we cannot write "depends on chromium-pepper-flash || google-chrome"), I then propose to evaluate which use-case is more common from these two:
- one uses firefox and chrome simultaneously
- one uses just firefox OR firefox and chromium simultaneously

Then the more common use-case can be honored in PKGBUILD, while the less common one can be e. g. commented out.