Package Details: fish-git 2:3.0.2.r1024.g0784b7657-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/fish-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: fish-git
Description: User friendly shell intended mostly for interactive use.
Upstream URL: http://fishshell.com
Keywords: shell
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: fish, fish-shell
Provides: fish, fish-shell
Submitter: SanskritFritz
Maintainer: SanskritFritz
Last Packager: SanskritFritz
Votes: 61
Popularity: 0.92
First Submitted: 2010-11-17 22:27
Last Updated: 2019-05-03 16:11

Dependencies (7)

Required by (27)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last »

SanskritFritz commented on 2012-12-27 13:49

@spicey Thanks for the heads-up, updated.

spicey commented on 2012-12-27 11:56

make_completions.py is also recently removed, so that sed call needs to go as well.

SanskritFritz commented on 2012-12-12 21:55

@mikezackles: Indeed, thanks for the heads-up.

mikezackles commented on 2012-12-12 18:37

internalize_scripts.py doesn't appear to exist in the latest checkout, so I had to remove the sed call to swap python for python2 on line 38.

fosskers commented on 2012-07-21 15:38

Thanks for going out of your way to ask about it.

SanskritFritz commented on 2012-07-21 14:44

Ok, arm added, according to this: http://archlinux.2023198.n4.nabble.com/AUR-and-unsuported-architectures-td4655207i20.html#a4657627

fosskers commented on 2012-07-21 06:53

Forgive my ignorance about base-devel.

Arch Linux Arm users _do_ install from _this_ AUR, but this is usually done by passing flags to yaourt that ignore architecture.
If 'arm' is included for packages that have proven to build on arm, then this architecture ignoring would not be necessary.

Either way, no harm could come by adding 'arm' to the PKGBUILD. It wouldn't even require a dedicated push by SanskritFritz. He could just include it the next time he decides to make a push from the git repo.

Note that there are many other packages here that _do_ include 'arm' in their architecture field.

fosskers commented on 2012-07-21 06:52

Forgive my ignorance about base-devel.

Arch Linux Arm users _do_ install from _this_ AUR, but this is usually done by passing flags to yaourt that ignore architecture.
If 'arm' is included for packages that have proven to build on arm, then this architecture ignoring would not be necessary.

Either way, no harm could come by adding 'arm' to the PKGBUILD. It wouldn't even require a dedicated push by SanskritFritz. He could just include it the next time he decides to make a push from the git repo.

vasily commented on 2012-07-21 05:55

All packages from base-devel group are assumed to be installed. Check the wiki about that.
Also check archlinuxarm.org if you need packages that build on various ARM devices.

fosskers commented on 2012-07-21 03:52

Hey again.

This builds on arm devices, so could you add 'arm' to the architecture field?

Also, could you add `autoconf` and `make` as makedeps?