Package Details: firefox-nightly 71.0a1.20190904-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-nightly.git (read-only)
Package Base: firefox-nightly
Description: Standalone Web Browser from Mozilla — Nightly build (en-US)
Upstream URL: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/nightly
Keywords: browser gecko web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: ArchangeGabriel
Last Packager: ArchangeGabriel
Votes: 560
Popularity: 1.841723
First Submitted: 2008-09-10 14:23
Last Updated: 2019-09-04 19:29

Required by (1)

Sources (8)

Pinned Comments

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-06-15 12:42

If you face this:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... yyyymmdd-firefox-xx.0a1.en-US.linux-${CARCH}.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key BBBEBDBB24C6F355)

Please read this.

Short answer:

gpg --recv-key 0x61B7B526D98F0353

If you face this:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... yyyymmdd-firefox-xx.0a1.en-US.linux-${CARCH}.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (bad signature from public key BBBEBDBB24C6F355)

Then just retry later (~1h), this is a CDN caching issue.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 ... Next › Last »

rican-linux commented on 2017-05-27 20:49

I am getting a gpg error when I try to build. I needed to add the mozilla software release key. Should there be a comment letting users know this or people should just know when they see the error to add the key?

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-05-26 13:48

@p4block: That is strange. What does `pacman -Q firefox-nightly` returns?

p4block commented on 2017-05-26 13:45

Pacaur thinks that this package needs upgrading every time I run -Syu. Anyone with the same problem?

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-05-18 19:52

amesxww: So I did some researches. GTK2 is only needed for NPAPI plugins, which since https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269807 means flash. And even then, I’m not sure how the new flash plugin plays here.

Someone using flash and not relying on GTK2 for anything important in the system volunteering to try without GTK2? At the very least I’m moving the dep to optdep.

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-05-14 19:18

@amesxww: Source? Because at least on Arch it’s still here: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/firefox/.

amesxww commented on 2017-05-14 19:16

gtk2 is no longer a requirement of firefox. It hasn't been for over a year on stable.

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-05-12 15:09

@Aetf: OK, I’ll change that.

@amesxww: I think so. If you try running it without gtk2, tell us what it gives. ;)

Also, CDN issues are resolved upstream. There should not be mismatch between tarball and sig anymore.

amesxww commented on 2017-05-01 20:47

Is gtk2 still a requirement for firefox?

Aetf commented on 2017-04-17 17:42

@ArchangeGabriel, the startup-notification seems to be optional. Since I didn't have that installed and everything works fine.

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-04-17 14:19

@Aetf: I’ve updated the PKGBUILD.