Package Details: firefox-nightly 71.0a1.20190904-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/firefox-nightly.git (read-only)
Package Base: firefox-nightly
Description: Standalone Web Browser from Mozilla — Nightly build (en-US)
Upstream URL: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/nightly
Keywords: browser gecko web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: ArchangeGabriel
Last Packager: ArchangeGabriel
Votes: 559
Popularity: 1.656921
First Submitted: 2008-09-10 14:23
Last Updated: 2019-09-04 19:29

Required by (1)

Sources (8)

Pinned Comments

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-06-15 12:42

If you face this:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... yyyymmdd-firefox-xx.0a1.en-US.linux-${CARCH}.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key BBBEBDBB24C6F355)

Please read this.

Short answer:

gpg --recv-key 0x61B7B526D98F0353

If you face this:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... yyyymmdd-firefox-xx.0a1.en-US.linux-${CARCH}.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (bad signature from public key BBBEBDBB24C6F355)

Then just retry later (~1h), this is a CDN caching issue.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous ... 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... Next › Last »

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-06-15 12:42

If you face this:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... yyyymmdd-firefox-xx.0a1.en-US.linux-${CARCH}.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (unknown public key BBBEBDBB24C6F355)

Please read this.

Short answer:

gpg --recv-key 0x61B7B526D98F0353

If you face this:

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... yyyymmdd-firefox-xx.0a1.en-US.linux-${CARCH}.tar.bz2 ... FAILED (bad signature from public key BBBEBDBB24C6F355)

Then just retry later (~1h), this is a CDN caching issue.

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-06-15 12:39

@zwindl: What kind of problem? Can you paste the log somewhere and link it here?

@rican-linux and @fredmorcos: Sorry, I missed your posts. I’m pinning a comment about GPG handling.

zwindl commented on 2017-06-15 12:37

I got a gpgkey problem, and it says can't verify package with sha512sums. What should I provide or what should I do to solve that problem?

fredmorcos commented on 2017-05-29 08:56

@rican-linux care to share what you did? i added the keys but it still does not work for me. same gpg error.

p4block commented on 2017-05-28 13:41

@ArchangeGabriel: I always got the same version as the one available, and appending --needed would skip the package although it was listed as upgradeable. Somehow the issue solved itself today though. That was weird. Will report if it happens again.

EDIT: happened on another PC. There was a version mismatch (*16 vs *18) but pacaur was upgrading to the old package all the time for some reason. Manual rebuild of the package managed to finally upgrade the thing.

rican-linux commented on 2017-05-27 20:49

I am getting a gpg error when I try to build. I needed to add the mozilla software release key. Should there be a comment letting users know this or people should just know when they see the error to add the key?

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-05-26 13:48

@p4block: That is strange. What does `pacman -Q firefox-nightly` returns?

p4block commented on 2017-05-26 13:45

Pacaur thinks that this package needs upgrading every time I run -Syu. Anyone with the same problem?

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-05-18 19:52

amesxww: So I did some researches. GTK2 is only needed for NPAPI plugins, which since https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269807 means flash. And even then, I’m not sure how the new flash plugin plays here.

Someone using flash and not relying on GTK2 for anything important in the system volunteering to try without GTK2? At the very least I’m moving the dep to optdep.

ArchangeGabriel commented on 2017-05-14 19:18

@amesxww: Source? Because at least on Arch it’s still here: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/firefox/.