Package Details: firefox-kde-opensuse 81.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: firefox-kde-opensuse
Description: Standalone web browser from with OpenSUSE patch, integrate better with KDE
Upstream URL:
Keywords: browser gecko web
Licenses: GPL, MPL, LGPL
Conflicts: firefox
Provides: firefox=81.0
Submitter: csslayer
Maintainer: Thaodan
Last Packager: Thaodan
Votes: 322
Popularity: 2.53
First Submitted: 2009-12-11 09:10
Last Updated: 2020-09-26 10:35

Dependencies (48)

Required by (114)

Sources (23)

Pinned Comments

Thaodan commented on 2018-07-11 18:15

upstream git repo:* (

repo in /etc/pacman.conf:

Server =

import the key

sudo pacman-key --recv-keys BBFE2FD421597395E4FC8C8DF6C85FEE79D661A4
pacman-key --finger BBFE2FD421597395E4FC8C8DF6C85FEE79D661A4
sudo pacman-key --lsign-key  BBFE2FD421597395E4FC8C8DF6C85FEE79D661A4
sudo pacman-key --refresh-keys


gpg: enabled debug flags: memstat
gpg: keydb: handles=1 locks=0 parse=0 get=1
gpg:        build=0 update=0 insert=0 delete=0
gpg:        reset=0 found=1 not=1 cache=0 not=0
gpg: kid_not_found_cache: count=0 peak=0 flushes=0
gpg: sig_cache: total=2 cached=2 good=2 bad=0
gpg: random usage: poolsize=600 mixed=0 polls=0/0 added=0/0
           outmix=0 getlvl1=0/0 getlvl2=0/0
gpg: rndjent stat: collector=0x0000000000000000 calls=0 bytes=0
gpg: secmem usage: 0/32768 bytes in 0 blocks
pub   rsa2048 2015-02-13 [SC]
       BBFE 2FD4 2159 7395 E4FC  8C8D F6C8 5FEE 79D6 61A4
uid        [ ultimativ ] Björn Bidar <>
sub   rsa2048 2015-02-13 [E]

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

Thaodan commented on 2020-09-08 21:03

No won't do that. If you have issues with the binary repo either write my an email or report on gitlab.

ShayBox commented on 2020-09-08 20:11

Please put firefox-kde-opensuse in its own repository, you have to put home-thaodan above other third party mirrors because they provide outdated builds (78-79) but doing so makes so many packages out of date because none of the other packages on home-thaodan are updated

Thaodan commented on 2020-09-02 17:45

Please great a bug on gitlab. Give an example to test and compare with the base arch package.

Scrumplex commented on 2020-09-02 17:38

Looks like service workers don't work with either your binary or this package in general.

Failed to load ‘https://hass/frontend_latest/authorize.3f02e4e6.js’. A ServiceWorker intercepted the request and encountered an unexpected error. service_worker.js:1:10770
Loading failed for the module with source “https://hass/frontend_latest/authorize.3f02e4e6.js”. authorize:1:1

Interestingly when opening the url mentioned FF shows a generic error screen, with the following error in the console:

Failed to load ‘’. A ServiceWorker intercepted the request and encountered an unexpected error. service_worker.js:1:10770
The character encoding of the plain text document was not declared. The document will render with garbled text in some browser configurations if the document contains characters from outside the US-ASCII range. The character encoding of the file needs to be declared in the transfer protocol or file needs to use a byte order mark as an encoding signature. authorize.3f02e4e6.js
No strings exist for error: corruptedContentErrorv2-title aboutNetError.js:229:13
This error page has no error code in its security info aboutNetError.js:585:13

Thaodan commented on 2020-05-14 00:10


Sorry for the large delay in updates on this package. I didn't had the time to update the pkg for a while and had some larger bugs to fix as visible in the git log.

The package now requires a patched version of graphite as mozilla patched theirs to include some functions for their sandbox that result in faster speed.

Also I had to add a workaround because of a different behaiviour when it comes to gcc if lto is used compared clang.

If something else comes up please file an issue on gitlab.

renzobenzo commented on 2020-04-06 03:43

Is this still maintained?

Teyro commented on 2020-04-03 20:24

Hi there,

is there a chance for an update? 72 is really old und its every dady harder to get it stable working...

Thaodan commented on 2020-02-04 09:18

@k0r0ng: Sorry I forgot to push the updating commit, done. @ShayBox: You don't seem to get how I'm using the gitlab repo, please look closer before complaining.

ShayBox commented on 2020-02-04 07:49

aur packages are git repositories, you should be commit/pushing to this, using gitlab as your main repo defeats the purpose of using the aur packages git repo, you could just make this package pull the gitlab repo.

k0r0ng commented on 2020-01-30 16:48

I know v72.0.2 is in your repo(, but can you update the PKGBUILD that is also here(AUR).