Package Details: evelauncher 1548102-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: evelauncher
Description: Unofficial Eve Online Launcher.
Upstream URL:
Keywords: Eve Online
Licenses: custom
Submitter: grim_sleepless
Maintainer: ModYokosuka
Last Packager: ModYokosuka
Votes: 24
Popularity: 0.000005
First Submitted: 2017-02-11 06:27
Last Updated: 2019-09-23 04:35

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3

vagyok commented on 2017-08-04 11:19

I got it to work by making a symlink called in the launcher folder pointing to /usr/lib/ , and another symlink in the launcher folder called pointing to /usr/lib/ .

Another potential source of confusion is that there is both an evelauncher and an executable. Make sure to use

For Optimus, rather than the optirun command, I used primusrun (optirun seems to have tried to force 32bit mode, which did not work)

When trying to start the game from within the launcher, initially it complained about missing assets. In the settings I unticked the test servers and ticked "download all", then waited until my ~/.eve/ResFiles/ folder was filled (~15GB at this time). If it fails to download all and complains about missing assets, restart the launcher, or delete the ~/.eve/ResFiles/ folder and ~/.eve/index*.txt and try downloading it all again (I had delete the resfiles and indices once and then it worked after redownloading everything).

For me the Qt5 libs turned out to not be the source of the problem, even though that's what the error messages were suggesting at first. I just left the Qt5 libs as they were in the original.

NovaMoon commented on 2017-05-30 15:46

I fixed the launcher issue for now. i applied this fix to the .dekstop file -

grim_sleepless commented on 2017-02-26 04:46

I have tried to strip out the Qt5 libs provided in the pacakge. So far I am getting this error:

QXcbIntegration: Cannot create platform OpenGL context, neither GLX nor EGL are enabled
QApplication: invalid style override passed, ignoring it.
Aborted (core dumped)

From what I found so far on this matter, it has something to do with the configuration when compiling Qt. Since it is a package from ArchLinux, I have to find a way to make it work.

Commander commented on 2017-02-25 23:52

Could we maybe strip out the qt binaries that they provide and add as deps instead so we could use arch repo QT?