Package Details: demlo 3.7.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/demlo.git (read-only)
Package Base: demlo
Description: A dynamic and extensible music library organizer
Upstream URL: http://ambrevar.bitbucket.io/demlo/
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: Ambrevar
Maintainer: Ambrevar
Last Packager: Ambrevar
Votes: 8
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2014-07-01 16:01
Last Updated: 2017-12-28 11:27

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

Ambrevar commented on 2018-02-17 20:47

I've just uploaded the -git PKGBUILD which I recommend instead of this one: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/demlo-git/.

Ambrevar commented on 2016-06-26 21:07

Updated, thanks man! ;)

runical commented on 2016-06-26 19:44

Hey man, your PKGBUILD needs git as a makedep for go to pull in the needed dependencies.

Ambrevar commented on 2016-01-11 06:57

Demlo's core was rewritten to Go, resulting in full Unicode support. Lua 3rd party depencies are gone.

Ambrevar commented on 2015-05-19 18:46

I am working on it. Demlo itself is fully compatible with lua5.3. But slnunicode needs to be ported first.

hawk07 commented on 2015-05-17 08:05

Does't work with Lua 5.3

Ambrevar commented on 2014-11-09 08:13

Fixed. Thanks!

sekret commented on 2014-11-08 21:07

This time for real!

$ makepkg -sirfcL
==> Making package: demlo 1.4-1 (Sat Nov 8 22:03:20 CET 2014)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Downloading master.tar.bz2...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 35564 100 35564 0 0 14662 0 0:00:02 0:00:02 --:--:-- 14659
==> Validating source files with sha1sums...
master.tar.bz2 ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

$ updpkgsums
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found master.tar.bz2
==> Generating checksums for source files...

$ makepkg -sirfcL
==> Making package: demlo 1.4-1 (Sat Nov 8 22:03:36 CET 2014)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found master.tar.bz2
==> Validating source files with sha1sums...
master.tar.bz2 ... Passed
==> Extracting sources...
-> Extracting master.tar.bz2 with bsdtar
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting package()...
/tmp/demlo/PKGBUILD: line 18: cd: /tmp/demlo/src/ambrevar-demlo-55589f740460: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...


sekret commented on 2014-11-08 21:05

This time for real!

$ makepkg -sirfcL
==> Making package: demlo 1.4-1 (Sat Nov 8 22:03:20 CET 2014)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Downloading master.tar.bz2...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 35564 100 35564 0 0 14662 0 0:00:02 0:00:02 --:--:-- 14659
==> Validating source files with sha1sums...
master.tar.bz2 ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
$ updpkgsums
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found master.tar.bz2
==> Generating checksums for source files...
$ updpkgsums
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found master.tar.bz2
==> Generating checksums for source files...
[sekret@Archlinux demlo]$ makepkg -sirfcL || clean
==> Making package: demlo 1.4-1 (Sat Nov 8 22:03:36 CET 2014)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found master.tar.bz2
==> Validating source files with sha1sums...
master.tar.bz2 ... Passed
==> Extracting sources...
-> Extracting master.tar.bz2 with bsdtar
==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting package()...
/tmp/demlo/PKGBUILD: line 18: cd: /tmp/demlo/src/ambrevar-demlo-55589f740460: No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting..


Now what?!

Ambrevar commented on 2014-10-15 18:19

I'm quite unhappy with bitbucket packaging: no version number in the archive, but a commit ref inside the archive. Because of that, I need to update the commit ref on each release.
A workaround is to publish a tarball manually, but that is not much more elegant...
Any clue how to improve this?

As for the _pkgname variable, this is because I use the same template for all my PKGBUILDs.