Search Criteria
Package Details: clojure-lsp-bin 1:2021.03.06_17.05.35-1
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/clojure-lsp-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | clojure-lsp-bin |
Description: | Language Server (LSP) for Clojure |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/clojure-lsp/clojure-lsp |
Licenses: | |
Conflicts: | |
Provides: | |
Submitter: | yodaembedding |
Maintainer: | dharrigan |
Last Packager: | dharrigan |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.58 |
First Submitted: | 2019-02-17 12:32 |
Last Updated: | 2021-03-06 17:44 |
Latest Comments
aramus commented on 2020-12-26 15:54
It works without error message and deleting the cache. Thanks for the fast response!
dharrigan commented on 2020-12-26 14:58
Hi,
Thank you for your comment and I apologise for the inconvenience that this has caused you. I have fixed it so that it should not occur again. Do let me know if you continue to have issues.
Thank you.
-=david=-
aramus commented on 2020-12-26 13:20
It's really annoying I always have to delete the cache just to update this package. Can you fix this?
dharrigan commented on 2020-10-23 14:48
Glad you got it to work! :-)
-=david=-
ctjhoa commented on 2020-10-23 13:34
I solved the sha256sum check failure by removing my AUR helper cache (eg. yay).
then validity check is OK.
dharrigan commented on 2020-10-10 18:01
Hi,
Thank you for the feedback, but I do believe the checksum is correct:
Please note that the previous version, 20200925T220747, does have the checksum
d838d6d7066f0ce7f1f1a6b8a2712610f4333fbc3661caf0a0b010aa15f0bade
.-=david=-
terminalnode commented on 2020-10-10 16:07
sha256sums check fails for most recent update. Works when changing it to
d838d6d7066f0ce7f1f1a6b8a2712610f4333fbc3661caf0a0b010aa15f0bade
.dkvasnicka commented on 2020-08-29 16:53
For me the installation is also failing because of
sha256sums
. However the SHA256 sum in the PKGBUILD is correct... Anyone any idea why the installation is still failing?lerouxrgd commented on 2020-05-18 16:07
It looks like it's not building anymore ?