Package Details: bibletime-git 2:v2.11_beta1.r7.g1be749c-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/bibletime-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: bibletime-git
Description: Bible study tool.
Upstream URL: http://www.bibletime.info/
Keywords: bible study
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: bibletime
Provides: bibletime
Submitter: SanskritFritz
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: SanskritFritz
Votes: 10
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2013-01-22 16:41
Last Updated: 2016-05-07 20:28

Dependencies (4)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »

Alister.Hood commented on 2013-08-01 22:48

But sword-svn=2793 would still be recent enough that it would enable indexing, wouldn't it?
Is there another reason the sword-svn-compat branch is used?

SanskritFritz commented on 2013-08-01 21:18

bibletime head does not compile against latest sword-svn. The development team follows sword-svn loosely on this branch.

Alister.Hood commented on 2013-07-31 00:31

I don't have bibletime (only xiphos), so I'm not 100% sure that it is relevant for bibletime, but you need sword-svn if you want to be able to index modules for super-fast searching.

Alister.Hood commented on 2013-07-31 00:30

I don't have bibletime, so I'm not 100% sure that it supports it anyway, but you need sword-svn if you want to be able to index modules for super-fast searching.

macxcool commented on 2013-07-30 18:25

Why are we using the sword-svn-compat branch? Does it make more sense to be able to get the latest changes to bibletime without having to worry about which exact version of sword-svn we're compiling against? Would you consider just using the main branch of bibletime in git and compiling against the latest sword release? I'm not trying to cause trouble, I'm just asking.

gunther commented on 2013-06-09 19:28

For anyone who gets the "ftptrans.h not found" error: it got renamed to remotetrans.h in svn HEAD of sword-svn

SanskritFritz commented on 2013-03-25 14:33

Ok, updated the PKGBUILD. Thanks for testing giddie.

giddie commented on 2013-03-25 14:05

Yes, that does the trick. Thanks :)

SanskritFritz commented on 2013-03-25 13:16

@giddie: Can you try to pass -DBT_FORCE_USE_QT4=TRUE to cmake?

giddie commented on 2013-03-25 11:08

Sorry, I forgot to subscribe to notifications, so I didn't notice your question! Yes, I have both Qt4 and 5 installed. I've got sword-svn=2792, and still seeing the same issue. (I tried it just now.)