Package Details: bedup 0.10.1-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: bedup
Description: Offline deduplication utility for the BTRFS filesystem
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: bedup-git
Submitter: omgold
Maintainer: TheNiceGuy
Last Packager: TheNiceGuy
Votes: 42
Popularity: 0.000018
First Submitted: 2013-04-27 09:47
Last Updated: 2016-06-27 01:16

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

erkexzcx commented on 2019-09-10 14:09

Hi. Can you change from

arch=('i686' 'x86_64' 'aarch64')



because it works just fine on any architecture?

G2P commented on 2016-10-26 16:26

It looks like the headers shipped by btrfs-progs have changed recently.
The git version ships them as a submodule, and the PyPI archive includes them as well; that should work better.

Enverex commented on 2016-10-26 15:08

Build fails pretty badly here -

Crazyachmed commented on 2016-06-04 21:13

please add aarch64 to supported list. seems to work for me ;)

darkbasic commented on 2016-05-18 09:27

Sorry I wanted to comment on python-editor, not bedup.
Anyway I confirm that 0.10.1 fixed the build issue.

G2P commented on 2016-05-18 07:34

The error fryfrog reports is fixed in
I just pushed a point release with the fix.

darkbasic commented on 2016-05-18 07:16

==> Removing existing $pkgdir/ directory...
==> Starting build()...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in <module>
from setuptools import setup
ImportError: No module named 'setuptools'
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().

fryfrog commented on 2016-05-11 05:56

Should one still use this? I tried to build it, but it fails.

Maybe gcc has had some big changes since this was last released by the source? :/

justin8 commented on 2013-12-30 07:25

FYI, for pkgbuilds, anything in 'base-devel' is assumed to be installed. that includes gcc. See:
As for conflicts with th. e git version, the git version should have a conflicts and a provides for bedup (which is already there). see:

WonderWoofy commented on 2013-06-03 02:47

Yeah, bedup git totally builds and installs... I wonder where I went wrong, as looking over the PKGBUILD, mine looked pretty much the same. Now to see if it works... Thanks for that.

I guess I can agree that having gcc in the makedepends certainly doens't hurt anything, and I think the ability to run makepkg w/o gcc is as it should be probably.

I think the only thing with the git package is that it should have "conflicts=('bedup')" so that in the event that bedup is installed bedup-git will not error out with "file exists in filesystem".

Now I wish I handn't deleted the PKGBUILD I made off of yours so that I could compare the two. I woundn't be surprised if I just had some kind of typo in there. I guess when I think about it I really didn't put much time into debugging it.