Package Details: atom-editor-bin 1.48.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/atom-editor-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: atom-editor-bin
Description: Hackable text editor built on Electron (official precompiled binary)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/atom/atom
Keywords: atom editor
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: apm, atom, atom-editor, atom-editor-git, atom-editor-git-tagged, atom-notracking
Provides: apm, atom
Submitter: butangmucat
Maintainer: grawlinson (forivall, alexheretic)
Last Packager: grawlinson
Votes: 325
Popularity: 1.08
First Submitted: 2014-05-29 04:06
Last Updated: 2020-06-11 08:03

Pinned Comments

grawlinson commented on 2017-09-25 18:18

To whoever submitted a deletion request:

The package in the official repos modifies the package a bit, and as such, bug reports usually will not be accepted upstream.

This package aims to keep things as close to upstream as possible, so that any bug reports originating from Arch users can actually be useful to upstream developers.

EDIT (28/09/17): Thanks to @onestone who has collated a few links explaining why this package bundles Electron, et al. I have attached them to this comment for posterity.

EDIT (08/05/19): Thanks to @wyre who has added another upstream link.

Upstream links:

community/atom bug report:

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 ... Next › Last »

roflmaostc commented on 2020-05-15 09:37

You're right, sorry for the confusion. A cleanBuild All fixed it.

grawlinson commented on 2020-05-14 19:44

That’s a network issue on your end, not a package issue.

roflmaostc commented on 2020-05-14 19:12

Hey, following error occurs:

==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Error downloading sources: atom-editor-bin

micronetic commented on 2020-02-11 14:02

Thanks for the fix, the update went smooth now.

madjoe commented on 2020-02-11 04:12

Validating source files with sha512sums... LICENSE ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

xamerin commented on 2020-02-10 22:18

Package fails validation check.

aguegu commented on 2019-06-06 01:34

Ok, it is my bad. The problem is that pamac did not cleanup its cache. So after a broken installation, all attempts to reinstall only checksum on the cached files. My another manjaro machine works fine though. I am sorry for my false alarm.

grawlinson commented on 2019-06-05 03:55

Please post on a Manjaro specific forum as it is not supported here.

aguegu commented on 2019-06-05 01:55

sha256sum still fails for me, on manjaro, upgrade with pamac.

Building atom-editor-bin... ==> Making package: atom-editor-bin 1.37.0-2 (Wed 05 Jun 2019 09:50:19 AM CST) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found atom-amd64-v1.37.0.deb -> Found LICENSE -> Found atom-editor-bin.install -> Found atom-python.patch -> Found startupwmclass.patch ==> Validating source files with sha512sums... atom-amd64-v1.37.0.deb ... FAILED LICENSE ... Passed atom-editor-bin.install ... Passed atom-python.patch ... Passed startupwmclass.patch ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

grawlinson commented on 2019-05-31 02:49

That’s strange that the deb fails checksum. I’ll have a look at the package when I get home, unless one of the other maintainers fixes this before I do.

EDIT: sha512sum verification doesn't fail on my system. Are you able to provide more details?